Center for Teaching and Learning
About the CTL Staff Directory Newsletters Work With Us
Resources for Teaching Home Getting Started Teaching at UMSL Syllabus Templates Digital Accessibility in Teaching Policies and Procedures Online Teaching Resources Assessment Technology Support Frequently Asked Questions and Who to Contact When Course Development Teaching Resources Community Keep Teaching and Learning
Student Support Home Active Learning Assistant Program (ALA) Supplemental Instruction Program (SI) Tritons as Partners Programs (TAP) Online Student Resources CoursEval Student Resources
Events and Programs Home Ongoing Programs Conferences Orientations Previous Programs
Feedback on Teaching Home CoursEval Schedule CoursEval for Students Guidance for Promotion and Tenure Committees Mid-Semester Feedback Program Assessment Handbook Teaching Effectiveness Taskforce

Mid-Semester Feedback

Mid-Semester Feedback 

Mid-Semester Feedback has undergone a revision and transitioned to the CoursEval tool, the same platform UMSL uses to collect End-of-Course Student Feedback. The revised question set was piloted in CoursEval during the Fall 2024 and Spring 2025 semesters.

Opt-in to Fall 2026 Mid-Semester Feedback

Mid-Semester Feedback is an optional and anonymous online survey administered through the CoursEval tool to help faculty solicit early feedback from students in 16-week courses. The feedback allows instructors to adjust or optimize a course while the semester is still in progress, provides insights into professional development, and empowers students to feel involved in shaping their educational experience. Results are confidential! Only the course instructor has access to view survey reports. Department Chairs, Deans, or other administrators cannot access them. The Mid-Semester Feedback survey is designed to support formative improvement, not evaluative decision‑making.

Benefits for Faculty

Research has shown that soliciting mid-semester feedback can:

  • Stimulate and motivate faculty to learn more and improve their teaching methods
  • Positively impact student perceptions, motivations, and engagement
  • Improve end-of-semester survey results

Instructors can use early feedback to identify student concerns or opportunites for clarification, adjust pacing or expectations, and gain a clearer picture of how students are experiencing the course at the mid-point of the semester. 

Benefits for Students

  • Students feel empowered to share what is working well and what may be challenging
  • Feedback can reduce barriers to learning and increase clarity
  • Transparency in the follow-up process strengthens communication and trust
  • Students can see their feedback directly influence the learning environment

 

How to Use Mid-Semester Feedback Results

The Mid-Semester Feedback Survey serves a fundamentally different purpose from the common End-of-Course Student Feedback Survey and should be interpreted with a formative, growth-oriented lens. The goal is not to summarize performance, but to understand how students are experiencing the course at the mid-point and identify small adjustments that can support learning during the rest of the semester. Here are several strategies that can help faculty make the most of Mid-Semester Feedback results.

Students often respond to the open-ended questions in narrative form. As you review comments, look for recurring themes across multiple responses rather than focusing on single strong opinions. Consistent patterns, whether about pacing, assignments, or communication, are usually the most meaningful indicators of the current learning experience.  

For support identifying themes in the open-response questions, faculty may use Microsoft Copilot to help organize and summarize comments. Copilot can help you spot patterns, group related ideas, and highlight strengths students notice, but your professional judgment should guide what actions you choose to take. Please only use Copilot when you are logged in with your UM System Microsoft 365 account, which keeps all data private and stored securely within our system. ChatGPT or other public AI tools should not be used for this purpose unless you have a University-approved educational license. For more information about current guidance on AI tools, including which platforms are approved, please see the UMSL ITS Artificial Intelligence website. 

You can use the prompt below to get started:

I am a faculty member reviewing private mid-semester feedback for [COURSE NAME]. Please analyze the comments below by:

  • Identifying the main recurring themes
  • Sorting feedback into
  • Things I can address this semester
  • Things to control for future course revisions
  • Things outside my control
  • Highlighting strengths students consistently mention
  • Pointing out contradictory or mixed feedback and suggesting how to interpret it
  • Summarizing the top 3-5 takeaways I can act on

Here are the student comments:

[PASTE COMMENTS HERE]

Mid-Semester Feedback often highlights ideas about improving clarity or logistics. Identify one or two small, feasible changes you can implement right away. Students are not expecting an overhaul; even small adjustments can significantly improve engagement or reduce confusion.
Some suggestions can be acted on during the current semester, while others may be more appropriate for future iterations of the course. Use Mid-Semester Feedback to distinguish changes that can immediately support students this semester from those that could inform course redesign later.
Because Mid-Semester Feedback is mid-course and personal, it can feel urgent, but not all suggestions require changes. Evaluate whether the feedback aligns with your goals, disciplinary expectations, and pedagogy. Maintain the integrity of your course design while still being responsive.
Read feedback with curiosity and context. Consider what is happening in the course—and in students’ other courses!—when they are completing the survey. External factors such as major assignments, overall workload, or points of high stress in the semester can influence student perceptions. Understanding these factors helps you distinguish between temporary pressures and patterns that point to ongoing needs in the learning experience.
After reviewing the results, take a few minutes in class or in Canvas to acknowledge what you heard, share what you plan to adjust, and explain what cannot reasonably change. This step increases student motivation and trust, and often improves subsequent feedback.
While Mid-Semester Feedback supports timely, in-semester adjustments, many instructors also use insights from Mid-Semester Feedback to guide longer-term reflection on their teaching. Patterns that emerge over multiple semesters can help faculty identify areas for sustained professional development or document responsiveness to student learning needs. Although it is non-evaluative and instructor-only, faculty may choose to reference themes from Mid-Semester Feedback in promotion and tenure materials as evidence of reflective, improvement-oriented teaching.

Access MyCoursEval

Current Year CoursEval Schedule

Questions?

Contact Sarah Butler, Learning Analytics Specialist