Workshops and Events
Sponsored Programs Administration
Planning Your Proposal
Submitting Your Proposal
Award Process & Management
IP Management & Commercialization
For UMSL Inventors
IP Available for Licensing
For UMSL Entrepreneurs
Animal Subjects (IACUC)
Conflict of Interest
Export Controls and Sanctions
Human Subjects (IRB)
Proposals, Grants and Contracts
International Activities Disclosures
Research & Commercialization Forms
Economic & Community Development
Corporate & Foundation Relation
For Faculty and Staff
Center for Neurodynamics (CND)
Community Innovation & Action Center (CIAC)
Missouri Institute of Mental Health (MIMH)
Resources for Partners
Should I publish or patent?
BOTH! Seeking a patent for a discovery or development does not prevent scientific publication and doesn't have to delay publishing. Our staff will work with patent attorneys to accommodate any publishing dates and still protect your invention. But to achieve optimum results, a description of the discovery should be submitted to the University at least three months in advance of first publication to allow time for review and drafting of a patent application.
What's the first step?
The technology transfer process begins when an inventor or inventors submit a confidential Invention Disclosure Form to the University. The form asks for such information as a description of the invention, names and contact data for everyone involved in making the invention, funding sources for the research that led to the invention, prior publications or public descriptions of the invention, commercial contacts in the field of the invention, and any potential conflicts of interest the inventors may have with commercial contacts.
How are inventions evaluated?
The IP Management & Commercialization (IPMC) office will evaluate the invention disclosure and discuss it with the inventor(s). The evaluation process involves two components: a patent and literature search to evaluate the uniqueness of the invention, and a marketability survey of the literature and industry contacts. The goal of these efforts is to answer two basic questions:
Is the invention patentable (new, useful, and not an obvious improvement on an existing invention)?
Is the invention licensable (will a company pay the University for the right to commercially practice the invention)?
If the answer to these questions appears to be yes, and if the expected return from licensing justifies the time and cost, the University will proceed with the patent application. The University has limited funds for the expensive process of patenting, so staff must make informed decisions about which inventions have the most potential to be legally protected and become valuable products. There doesn't necessarily have to be a massive market awaiting the product, but there does have to be some industrial or entrepreneurial interest in obtaining rights to develop a product, in funding further R&D in hopes of realizing the invention's value, or in starting a company to produce it.
How are inventors involved?
Inventor involvement is very important to the entire patenting and licensing process, however, the degree of involvement varies according to the nature of the invention and the availability and interest of the inventors. Inventor expertise is especially helpful during the evaluation for patentability, in the patent application process, in identifying licensing prospects, and in meeting with companies that express interest. Inventors often provide technical evaluation of previous patents and publications in their field, supply information to the patent attorney and review draft applications/USPTO action responses, and discuss technical aspects with interested companies. Regardless of the amount of involvement, inventors are kept informed of the evaluation process and any actions taken, and their input is considered in making decisions about the University's protection and licensing of the invention. However, final responsibility for such decisions rests with the University IP Management & Commercialization office.
How long does it take?
The disclosure evaluation process may take anywhere from a week to three months, and possibly longer, depending on the complexity of the invention and the target industry. After filing a patent application, it can take from one to three years for the patent to be issued or denied by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. It may take five years or longer for commercial sales to begin, depending on how much work needs to be done to develop and market a product based on the invention. University technology transfer offices find that it takes an average of eight years after an invention is disclosed to begin receiving significant royalties on sales.
Who owns UMSL inventions?
Like most universities, the University of Missouri's policy states that the University has first rights to acquire title to any invention that results from use of University resources or University-administered funds. External sponsors of research often require disclosure and patenting of results when appropriate, and they also may have some ownership rights. If the University and sponsoring agency decide not to protect and transfer an invention, ownership rights can be waived to the inventor(s).
Why should I participate in technology transfer?
The University is substantially supported by the public, including the majority of its research programs. The public deserves maximum return for its investment in research, through publication of results, sharing of expertise with students and others, and transfer of technologies to companies for commercialization. Many university inventors report great satisfaction in seeing their research efforts result in practical benefits to society. Many also find that the increased contact with industry improves the relevance of teaching programs and increases students' chances for internships and employment.
What is technology transfer?
Technology transfer is the formal transfer of rights to use and commercialize new discoveries and innovations resulting from scientific research to another party. Universities typically transfer technology through protecting (using patents and copyrights) and then licensing new innovations. Major steps in this process include the disclosure of innovations to the University, patenting the innovation concurrent with publication of scientific research, and licensing rights to innovations to industry for commercial development.
What are the goals and responsibilities of the UMSL Office of IP Management & Commercialization (OIPMC) in technology transfer?
The UMSL OIPMC manages all technology transfer activities on the St. Louis campus. The office's main objective and responsibility in technology transfer is to facilitate the transfer of UMSL's inventions to the private sector where these discoveries can be further developed for public use and benefit.
What is the Bayh-Dole Act?
The Bayh-Dole Act, passed by Congress in 1980, created a uniform patent policy among the U.S. federal agencies that fund research in the non-profit and small business sectors. The Act provides recipients of federal research funds with the right to retain ownership of their patents with the underlying tenet that federally funded inventions should be licensed for commercial development in the public interest. This principle is reflected in virtually all university policies whether or not the invention is federally funded.
Who has signature authority related to technology transfer?
The Chancellor at UMSL has signature authority on behalf of The Curators of the University of Missouri for license agreements, material transfer agreements, and other agreements that pertain to intellectual property. The Chancellor has delegated signature authority for many IP-related agreements to the Vice Chancellor for Research and Economic & Community Development and the Director of the Office of IP Management & Commercialization.
University faculty and other inventors are not authorized to sign agreements that obligate the University to assign or license intellectual property rights to another entity, maintain confidentiality, etc. Contact us for more information.
What is Intellectual Property (IP)?
IP refers to a legal entitlement that sometimes attaches to the expressed form of an idea, or to some intangible subject matter. This legal entitlement generally enables its holder to exercise exclusive rights of use in relation to the subject matter of the IP. The term "intellectual property" reflects the idea that this subject matter is the product of the mind or the intellect, and that IP rights may be protected by law in the same way as any other form of property.
IP can take the form of any new and useful process, machine, composition of matter, life form, article of manufacture, software, trademark, copyrighted work, or tangible research property. Examples include new or improved devices, circuits, chemical compounds, drugs, genetically engineered biological organisms, antibodies, clones, cell lines, data sets, software, web-based tools, musical processes, or unique and novel uses of existing inventions.
The term "intellectual property" generally relates to four distinct kinds of legal protection: patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets. Each kind of intellectual property is governed by its own body of federal and/or state law. The kinds of things that are protected by intellectual property law include scientific and engineering inventions (including new methods and apparatus), distinctive marks for identifying products or institutions, computer software, "know-how," and forms of expression that are affixed in tangible form (i.e., books, movies, artistic works of art).
Why is protection of intellectual property important?
IP is an asset to be developed, maintained and protected, not unlike land, equipment and facilities. By protecting it appropriately, it can return value and advantages to its owner and the inventive group.
If I invent something at the University, does it belong to the University?
In almost all cases, yes. If the intellectual property was developed by an employee of the University or invented at UMSL facilities under the supervision of UMSL personnel, the intellectual property is owned by UMSL. Each inventor must assign his or her rights in the intellectual property to UMSL. This includes all faculty, staff, fellows, and students who have an appointment at UMSL (can be defined as an " employee" as described in the UM Collected Rules & Regulations, Chapter 100.020 section C2).
This can be good news for you because the University assumes the burden of protecting and commercializing the invention and provides 1/3 of net proceeds to the inventor(s).
The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 charges the University with the responsibility to pursue commercial development of inventions resulting from federally sponsored research for the public interest.
In most cases, ownership is obvious; however, there can be exceptions. If you have questions about whether the University has an ownership claim, please contact us as quickly as possible for analysis.
It is important that you discuss the situation with the UMSL OIPMC as soon as you think you may have an invention. Not only will the office help to clarify the situation, its involvement may lead to the process of protecting and commercializing your invention and starting you, your department, and UMSL on the road to personal and institutional financial rewards.
Why do I need to keep a lab notebook, and how should I do this?
The America Invents Act, singed into law on Sept. 16, 2011, changes the way patents and trade secrets are handled in the United States. The most sweeping reform to the existing Patent Act since 1952, the America Invents Act includes changes such as the U.S. now grants patents to the first inventor to file rather than the first to invent. Lab notebooks under the old statute were key to proving first to invent. So, are lab notebooks important now that the United States is a "first-to-file" country?
Until the passage of the act, America was a “first-to-invent” country -- the first individual to invent something was the person entitled to patent the invention. If someone else filed first, the original inventor could overcome the other’s patent by by proving that the original inventor conceived of the invention and diligently reduced the invention to practice before the filing date of the other person’s patent. This required an inventor keep a detailed laboratory notebook. Now, with the United States converting to a "first-to-file" country, only the first inventor who files will receive the patent. However, carefully written notebooks are still necessary to establish the inventor's identity as required by the statute.
Maintaining Your Lab Notebook:
Another investigator should be able to replicate the invention by looking over your entries. The notebook should allow one to determine the nature of the project, when it commenced, what ideas were considered during the project, the compounds made or circuits and equipment actually built and tested, the results of the tests, the dates for each of the above and the final conclusions.
Notebook entries should be made in ink, using a permanently bound notebook with sequentially numbered pages.
Sign and date the inside front cover to indicate the first day of use. Entries should be signed and consecutively dated. An independent witness (i.e., someone who understands the technology but will not be named as a co-inventor) should regularly look over the entries and witness the same by signing and dating the notebook pages. Have your lab notebook witnessed daily if possible, but at least every two to four weeks.
Write legibly and identify entries with respect to the particular project for which the work was done. Use past tense to describe the experiments that were actually performed. Explain abbreviations and special terms that are not standard (in context, in a table of abbreviations, or in a glossary).
Provide detail. However, keep conclusions short and supported by the factual data. Avoid opinions or speculation.
Include all formulae or diagrams and sketches of circuits and equipment that were considered during the project, including the ones actually built and tested. Accompany each diagram and sketch with an explanatory note sufficient to identify and explain the subject matter.
Identify the project to which all data relate. If possible, indicate the project or experiment number, or at a minimum give a brief descriptive heading.
In general, avoid fragmentary diagrams or sketches, or diagrams or sketches without explanatory notes. Draw circuit diagrams, for instance, as comprehensively as possible, using blocks or similar notations to indicate conventional parts.
Avoid loose pages or inserts carrying sketches or other information. If a sketch or note is made on a loose piece of paper, and you wish to place it in your book without making another entry, permanently affix it in the notebook with tape and have its placement witnessed by another investigator. Make sure the taped-in information does not obscure any other information in the lab notebook. If the pages or inserts cannot be taped into the notebook, store them in a supplementary file (see next bullet point).
Keep supplementary files and papers (e.g., chromatography reports, biological assay data tables, etc.) in a supplemental file. Make sure every page in the supplemental file is tied directly to a primary lab notebook page and has an unambiguous reference name in the text of the lab notebook.
When two or more investigators are working on the same project, they should not split entries between two or more laboratory books. One book should be complete in itself. When two or more investigators are making entries in the same book, they should initial and date their own entries.
Make notations of the progress and completion of compounds, assemblies, or models being prepared for testing. Relate these entries to previous sketches or entries that explain how the compound or equipment is being made.
Successful testing of a compound or particular setup or piece of equipment is "reduction to practice" and the date of such accomplishment is important. Make notations of such tests, identifying the compound or equipment, and commenting on the results of the test. Give tabulated test data, if available. Avoid unnecessary derogatory remarks about tests.
Avoid erasures. If an error has been made, cross it out with a single line, initial and date the strikethrough. Then make a new entry.
Avoid modifications. Do not modify prior entries at a later date. If information was omitted, enter it under a new date and cross-reference to the previous entry.
Photographs are useful in keeping a complete laboratory notebook. Particularly where a model has been made and successfully tested, it is desirable to take one or more photographs which will serve as future identification. Permanently paste the photographs into the laboratory book, and give the date and identification, as well as the name of the photographer.
Never remove original pages from a laboratory notebook.
Keep laboratory notebooks in a safe place when not in use.
Index (e.g., by number, author, subject area) and save all completed notebooks in a central lab repository. Lab notebooks that relate to inventions on which patents have issued should be kept for the life of the patent plus six years.
- Use permanent ink
- Use consecutive, sequentially numbered pages
- Date entries
- Identify subject matter
- Include sketches, diagrams, etc.
- Explain sketches, diagrams, etc.
- Photos, drawings, etc. should be identified and attached
- Avoid erasures
- Avoid modifications
- Permanently affix attachments to the notebook
- Unambiguously tie supplemental file pages to a primary notebook page
- Make new entries, do not alter existing entries
- Have entries witnessed regularly
- Provide proper storage
- Index and save all lab notebooks
What about my inventions prior to joining the University?
The University does not claim ownership of such inventions. However, any developments or improvements of these inventions that you make while at UMSL may be owned by the University and should be disclosed to the University.
I made an invention on my own time without any University resources. Am I free to license and commercialize my invention on my own?
You have an obligation to disclose any inventions (even those made on your own time) to the University that you make concomitant with your employment by the University so that the UMSL Office of IP Management & Commercialization can determine whether the University has any rights to the invention.
Do I have to disclosure my research discoveries?
Yes. You can disclose your research discoveries by completing an Invention Disclosure Form. Such disclosure should occur prior to public disclosure.
When is the right time to submit a disclosure?
Whenever you feel you have identified a new research discovery that you feel is interesting, novel and important to advancing the field. Don't worry about whether or not you have an "Invention" or "Intellectual Property," we can help you figure that out. You should also disclose any such discovery either simultaneously with or prior to a public disclosure such as submitting an abstract for a scientific meeting or submitting a manuscript.
Do I need to demonstrate that my invention works before disclosing it to the University?
Because much can be lost by not contacting the UMSL IP Management & Commercialization office early in your research, it is best to communicate with us before your invention is fully implemented. It is not necessary to have a model or working demonstration to file a patent application.
How do I benefit from disclosing my invention to the University?
Official disclosure is a necessary first step for proper evaluation and protection of your invention in order to bring about the commercialization of the technology. Its primary purpose is to collect information to help evaluate the invention for patentability and commercial potential. We strongly recommend that you complete the Invention Disclosure Form as soon as you think your research has yielded a discovery or invention. As an official document, the completed form serves to establish a legal record of the date of conception of the invention. It is important to note that disclosing your invention to the University is required. In addition, submission of the disclosure form is required by all federal funding agencies; the university faces strict requirements regarding inventions discovered through sponsored research. Please contact our office if you have any questions regarding this part of the process.
The inventor(s) receive 1/3 of patent licensing revenues brought in by the University. The inventor's department(s) receive 2/9 of revenues after expenses to fund additional research. Another 2/9 goes to the UM System to fund future patent applications, and the final 2/9 goes to the campus technology transfer fund to facilitate commercialization activities.
For copyright licenses, the author(s) receive 50% of copyright licensing revenues brought in by the University. The inventor's department(s) receives 50%, usually with some percentage of that share going to the campus technology transfer office.
How do I inform the University regarding a possible invention in my lab?
Complete and submit an Invention Disclosure Form. Completion of this form enables efficient review of the invention. Faculty participation at this step is often key to successful licensing of the invention because the inventor(s) are the most knowledgeable of their field and often can provide the most promising commercial licensing leads.
Why do you ask what funding source(s) I have?
Federal regulations under the Bayh-Dole Act (1980) require that government-funded inventions be reported to the federal agency who made the award. As a service to grant awardees, our office uses a system call iEdison to report inventions to the funding agency.
Another reason we ask for this information pertains to the Intellectual Property rights under any funding agreement. Although funding agreements with the Federal government are pretty standard and fall under Bayh-Dole, those with private agencies are not and it is important that we know about the funding source to determine those rights.
Should I disclose before or after I have submitted my work in abstract or manuscript form?
It is critical to disclose your invention as soon as the invention is in hand. Thus, you should be disclosing well before a manuscript or abstract is drafted.
Disclosing early affords many advantages, including proper assessment of the technology, development of an appropriate management and marketing plan by the UMSL Technology Transfer Office, and the ability for interested companies to evaluate the licensing opportunity before the opportunity to obtain patent rights is lost.
Depending on the invention, many companies may have no interest in licensing the invention unless they can obtain a license well in advance of any enabling public disclosure of the invention in order to have lead-time over their competitors.
Importantly, the ability to obtain foreign patent protection for an invention is lost immediately upon the enabling public disclosure of such an invention. Many companies are not interested in licensing rights to inventions for which foreign patent protection no longer is available.
If you have already submitted your work in abstract or manuscript form, contact us as soon as possible.
What happens once I have submitted an Invention Disclosure Form?
We will review your invention with you and coordinate a preliminary evaluation of the invention’s potential for IP protection and successful commercialization.
With the information gathered in the evaluation, we will decide whether to file a patent application to protect the invention.
If a scholarly publication or other public disclosure is imminent, we will accelerate the process of reviewing, drafting, and filing a patent application in order to preserve your patent rights.
If the technology appears commercially viable, a marketing plan will be developed and undertaken.
Once a committed licensee is identified, the IP Management & Commercialization office will be responsible for negotiating the license to the technology.
Who should be listed as “inventors” on the Invention Disclosure Form?
Unlike authorship of a scientific publication, inventorship is a matter of law. A patent that fails to name the correct inventors may be ruled invalid.
A lawful inventor is one who makes an inventive contribution to one or more of the claims that formally define the invention -- a person who makes an original, significant intellectual contribution leading to the conception of the invention. Someone who provides equipment, space or money, no matter how critical to the development of the invention, is not an inventor. Also, someone who performs work under the supervision of another party is not an inventor, even though that person may have worked long hours or conducted a critical experiment.
Because patent claims may change as the patent application is being drafted and also while it is undergoing prosecution by the patent office, inventorship may change as well.
For the purposes of filing your Invention Disclosure Form, name as inventors the individuals who have made a creative contribution to the invention (a creative contribution may include contributing a seminal idea towards the conception of the invention or overcoming a technical hurdle in the reduction to practice of the invention). When necessary, the University will initiate a formal inventorship determination using outside patent counsel.
Is software valuable?
Like any invention, software is an asset that has value to the University and to its author(s). Often even the simplest software function has commercial value simply because of the time invested in writing the code, not to mention the expertise needed to develop the function.
Should I file an invention disclosure if I have created software?
Software should be disclosed to the University early in the development process. Disclosure to the University should be made before any public disclosure (oral or written) of the information is made. In this way, an informed evaluation can be completed for the potential invention and an appropriate protection (e.g., patent applications, copyright registration) and marketing strategy developed. Disclosure should be made using the Software Disclosure Form.
How do I know who is an "author" on a copyrighted work?
In general, the authors of a copyrighted work are those individuals who create the work with the intention that their contributions be merged into inseparable or interdependent parts of a unitary whole. The parts of a work are interdependent when they have some meaning standing alone but achieve their primary significance because of their combined effect. Joint authors need not work together or concurrently. In addition, the respective contributions need not be equal either quantitatively or qualitatively. However, each contribution must be more than de minimis. In short, to qualify as a joint author, a person must show that she/she and the other author (1) intended to create a joint work; and (2) each contributed independently copyrightable material.
How is intellectual property protected?
Generally, by federal patent law, federal copyright law, federal trademark law, state trademark law, state laws regarding trade secrets and other laws related to businesses and contracts.
What is a Patent?
A patent is the grant of a property right to the inventor(s). U.S. patents, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), are effective only within the United States, U.S. territories and U.S. possessions. A patent right is "the right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling" the invention in the United States or "importing" the invention into the United States.
There are three types of patents:
Utility patents may be granted to anyone who invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, article of manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof;
Design patents may be granted to anyone who invents a new, original, and ornamental design for an article of manufacture; and
Plant patents may be granted to anyone who invents or discovers and asexually reproduces any distinct and new variety of plant.
What is a Provisional Patent?
The provisional patent application is an application that can be filed with the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) that establishes an early effective filing date of a patent application. The provisional application is not examined by the USPTO, and may remain pending for one year. At the end of the period, UMSL must elect either to drop the filing, allowing the information to become public, or to convert the provisional application to a regular patent application. UMSL's Technology Transfer Office (TTO) will work with the inventors to make this decision on behalf of the University.
How long does patent protection last?
Utility and plant patents issuing from the applications filed after June 7, 1995, will expire twenty (20) years from the date of filing. The terms of certain utility patents, however, may be extended to compensate for the following:
Delays resulting from the failure of the USPTO to examine a new application within 14 months of filing;
Delays caused by the USPTO's failure to issue a patent within three years from filing, unless the delay was caused by the applicant; and
Delays caused by the USPTO's failure to take certain office actions for more than four (4) months.
What kind of research is patentable?
For the standard type of patent, called a utility patent, an invention may be any new and useful process, machine, composition of matter, or article of manufacture (i.e. an artificial, man-made thing rather than an unprocessed, natural object or material), apparatus, instrumentation, circuits, computer programs, biological materials, chemicals. An improved version of previous technology may be patentable, as well as a new use for an existing technology. The process of invention begins with conception of the invention. Inventions eligible for a U.S. patent must be novel, useful, and non-obvious:
What does “novel” mean?
The invention must be noticeably different from publicly available inventions. This does not mean that all aspects of an invention must be novel. For example, new uses of known processes, matter, or materials are patentable. Incremental improvements on known processes may also be patentable. To be considered novel, an invention must be the inventor’s original work. In addition, the inventor must file a patent application within certain time constraints if the invention has been publicly disclosed.
What does “useful” mean?
The invention must demonstrate some application or utility, or be an improvement over existing products and/or techniques.
What does “non-obvious” mean?
A patentable invention must be “non-obvious” to someone of “ordinary skill in the art.” This does not include recognized experts in the field. One guideline of non-obviousness is when the change is somewhat surprising to one with “ordinary skill,” yet this someone is knowledgeable enough in the field to understand the utility of the invention. This requirement is difficult to judge, for it is hard to predict with certainty what the patent examiner will find obvious or non-obvious. An invention can be “non-obvious” if it is a combination of old elements used in a new way to produce a new, unexpected result. Similarly, an invention can be considered “non-obvious” if others have attempted to achieve the invention but failed. Some situations require affidavits from experts stating that the invention is not obvious to one skilled in the art.
What is prior art?
Prior Art refers to public knowledge existing before the date an invention was made that is related to the invention or is in the field of the invention. Prior art can include published journal articles and abstracts, previously filed patents, and, in some cases, non-written knowledge made public such as material presented at a scientific conference. In order to obtain a patent, an applicant (inventor) must not only prove usefulness, but also that his/her invention is novel over the prior art and non-obvious to someone of ordinary skill in the art.
What is a barring event?
The publication, use, offer for sale or sale of an invention anywhere in the world is known as a barring event. If a year passes between one of these events and the date when a patent application is filed on the invention, the inventor is barred from patenting the invention in the United States. A barring event may and often will immediately preclude UMSL or the inventor from seeking patent protection in a country other than the United States.
Who prepares and prosecutes patent applications?
The University retains the services of highly qualified patent attorneys selected on the basis of their specialized knowledge in various fields of expertise. They prepare and prosecute patent applications.
What is the cost of obtaining a patent?
The cost of obtaining a patent depends on multiple factors, including the amount of protection desired (domestic versus foreign) and the complexity of the patent prosecution. The costs for prosecuting a U.S. patent application typically range from $15,000 to $40,000 through issuance. Costs for prosecuting foreign patent applications can range from $10,000 to $15,000 or more per country for filing. Maintenance costs add several thousand dollars per patent.
Who pays for the patent application?
The University pays for all costs associated with the preparation, prosecution and maintenance of patents unless other arrangements are made with a collaborating entity. UMSL seeks reimbursement of patent costs through licensing.
How does the University manage patent costs?
UMSL seeks to recover its investment by licensing the patent rights to competent, committed commercial developers.
The University's objective is not to file patent applications for the sake of filing them, not only because of the high cost of patent protection but also because not every patentable invention is licensable. Also, not every invention must be patented in order to be licensed, including tangible materials such as cell lines, transgenic mice, plasmids, and integrated circuit masks. Also, software can be licensed under a copyright license, and a copyright license for high quality, value-added software can be more lucrative than many patent licenses.
UMSL' objective is to file patent applications strategically to maximize the value of inventions we have determined are licensable because they represent a sound business opportunity and will afford competitive advantage to a licensee.
In order to best manage the costs and risks inherent in patent applications, UMSL prefers not to file a patent application until it has first found a committed licensee, and then it will file the patent application at the licensee’s expense. This minimizes financial exposure and facilitates patenting of only those inventions with true commercial potential. In addition, this strategy allows the licensee to participate in drafting the patent application so that the patent claims better support the licensee’s specific business needs, allowing for more favorable financial returns.
In some circumstances, the University will file a patent application “at risk” — without having first found a licensee to pay patent costs. Such filings are usually the result an imminent public disclosure of the invention that would result in the loss of foreign patent rights unless a U.S. patent application is filed prior to the public disclosure. UMSL's Technology Transfer Office will make an at-risk filing if its business analysis of the invention leads us to believe there is an excellent probability that a future license will result. Such analyses take considerable time if done properly, so it is imperative that you disclose your invention to the University well in advance of any public disclosure.
Why are some inventions not patented?
Some inventions and discoveries are best to remain in the public domain in order to ensure that they are freely and widely available.
For many early-stage technologies, the invention is in such an early stage that a patent application would not result in the issuance of a patent by the USPTO. In such cases, UMSL's Technology Transfer Office will encourage the inventor(s) to submit additional information to the University when the new information is available for a reevaluation of the technology.
What is a copyright?
A copyright is the grant of protection by the laws of the United States to the authors of 'original works' including literary, dramatic, musical, artistic, architectural and certain other intellectual works, and is available for both published and unpublished works. An owner has the exclusive right to authorize others to reproduce the work; create derivative works; distribute copies of the work; perform the copyrighted work publicly, display the work publicly, and if it is a sound recording, perform the work publicly. Software may be copyrighted, but may also, in certain circumstances, be protected by a patent.
How do you file for copyright protection?
Copyright protection automatically exists from the moment of creation, and a work is created when it is fixed in a tangible form. Therefore, no publication or registration or other action by the Copyright Office is required to secure a copyright, although certain advantages are retained for registered copyrights, such as the right to seek damages for copyright infringement. UMSL's Technology Transfer Office can assist in the process of registering a copyright.
What if a collaborator from another institution has contributed to my invention?
UMSL has inter-institutional agreements (IIAs) with several universities, research institutions and other organizations, and may negotiate such an agreement with your collaborator or institution. This type of agreement determines which institution would take the lead in patent and licensing of the invention, as well as how any royalty income would be shared. Each inventor should separately disclose the invention to his or her home institution.
I made an invention while consulting for a company and my client wants to file a patent application on it. Do I need to do anything besides helping the client with the application?
Although your consulting agreement most likely stipulates that the company owns any inventions you make in your capacity as its consultant, your employee agreement with the University dominates your obligations to your client. Please contact us as soon as possible — we will work with you and your client to determine if the University has any rights to the invention in whole or in part.
The company can take title to your invention if you made the invention without using any University resources and the subject matter of the invention falls outside the scope of your University research. If the University has any rights to the invention, the company then may negotiate with the UMSL Technology Transfer Office a royalty-bearing license to the University s rights in the invention.
A company has requested my consulting services. Am I able to consult while maintaining my position as a faculty member?
Faculty are able to consult as long as their obligations as consultants do not conflict with their obligations as University employees. Please refer to the UM Collected Rules & Regulations, 330.015 Policy on Conflict of Interest for information.
The University is not a party to most consulting agreements, which are private agreements between the company and faculty member. As such, the University cannot negotiate consulting agreements on behalf of University employees.
How is my invention marketed or licensed?
Once we do what we can to secure preliminary intellectual property protection, we coordinate the formulation of a strategy and business plan for commercialization. The most appropriate industry partners will be contacted, and, pursuant to confidentiality agreements, we will coordinate the disclosure of the invention and its potential. Often discussions with prospective partners lead to new business plans and strategies or modifications of those developed at an earlier stage. When a good fit is determined, we coordinate negotiations intended to lead to a sale or license of the invention.
What is a license agreement?
A license agreement is the standard agreement format by which the University and the Company seek to reach mutually acceptable licensing terms regarding an invention. Strategies for transferring inventions from universities to industry are based upon non-exclusive, exclusive, or limited-field licensing. A non-exclusive license is suitable for technologies, such as research tools, that are of interest to a number of companies. Exclusive licenses are generally granted for technologies where product development requires significant effort and investment on the part of the licensee. An exclusive market position is often necessary to justify the expense of the license. Exclusive licensing by discrete fields of use is most appropriate for some technologies because it allows for parallel commercial development of multiple fields or applications of the invention. All license agreements must protect the mission of the University by ensuring that faculty inventors retain rights to continue research in the licensed field, publish freely, and disseminate tangible research properties related to the technology to other academic researchers.
How are licensees found for new technologies?
Licensees can be identified in many ways:
- The inventors often are aware of the commercial companies who would be interested in the work.
- Industry-specific marketing efforts including trade show participation, affiliations and market research carried out by the IP Management & Commercialization office and/or 3rd-party firms also serve to identify potential licensees.
- Issued patents listed can provide names of companies who currently have patents similar in nature, and often times these can prove to be potential licensees as well.
Who conducts license negotiations on behalf of UMSL?
License negotiations are handled by the UMSL IP Management & Commercialization office.
What kind of financial terms are included in a license agreement?
The financial terms of a license agreement can vary greatly. They may include, but are not limited to, up-front fees, license reissue fees, minimum annual royalties, milestone payments, royalties and equity. Financial terms vary widely and are tailored to fit the specific nature of each technology and each license transaction.
Can equity be included in a license?
Equity may be transferred to the University in a license transaction as partial, or sometimes total, compensation for the rights conveyed. Typically, equity plays an important part in licensing to a start-up company.
How long does it take to execute a license agreement?
Every license is unique in that it brings together University intellectual property to solve a company's specific problem(s). Once the IP is identified by the company, terms of a license need to be negotiated. Execution can take as little as a few weeks to over a year, depending on the complexity and the response times of all involved.
If the University licenses my invention to a company, will I still be able to perform related research?
Yes. Our license terms always retain the right for the University to use the invention for educational and research purposes.
Who signs license agreements?
At UMSL, only the Chancellor and the Vice Provost for Research are authorized on behalf of The Curators of the University of Missouri to sign license agreements. Technology Transfer staff and UM General Counsel provide reviews to ensure compliance with university policies.
How is the income from licensing an invention distributed?
The University of Missouri St. Louis' revenue distribution policy, implemented July 1, 2021, for licensed Intellectual Property (patent rights, copyrights, plant varieties, trademarks etc.) is as follows after expenses:
- Inventor/Author Share: 1/3 to Inventor(s) / Author(s)
- Campus Share: 2/3 to campus technology transfer office to support further R&D and commercialization activities
- The campus share of revenues is first used to cover costs to patent and market technologies, along with activities to increase innovation in research, up to $150,000.
- The campus share revenue received by UMSL above $150,000 will be split 50:50 between the TTO and the inventor(s) / author(s) originating department(s)/unit(s).
What happens if an inventor leaves UMSL?
If an inventor leaves UMSL, the inventor is still entitled to the inventor's personal share of license revenue disbursement.
What happens if UMSL does not license my invention?
If, within a reasonable amount of time, a likely licensee has not been identified, the ORA may offer a license back to the inventor(s) or possibly decide to release title to the invention. Depending on the source of research funding, the inventor(s) may be able to obtain title to the invention. If the invention was made using federal research support, the ORA can only recommend to the government that rights be returned to the inventor(s).
What if I want to form a start-up company with my technology?
As part of its mission to commercialize University technologies, UMSL will definitely consider licensing requests from faculty inventors who want to start new companies with the technology that they have created. Although not obligated to do so, the University is willing to license technology to a faculty start-up company provided that the faculty inventors demonstrate a clear commitment and ability to develop the licensed technology. Additionally, a faculty inventor's involvement in such a start-up company must be disclosed to the University through a Potential Conflict of Interest disclosure (visit Compliance: Conflict of Interest).
Does the University sell intellectual property rights to third parties?
Generally not. Rights are granted to a third party on either an exclusive or non-exclusive basis to manufacture, have manufactured, and/or sell or use the technology to create products or processes. Licenses are granted such that the intellectual property must be returned to the University if the third party fails to fully develop and commercialize the rights granted. A sale of technology generally means there is no provision for return.
What is a Material Transfer Agreement (MTA)?
When university faculty want to share patented or unpatented intellectual property material (new compounds and formulations, biological research materials, genetic constructs, data sets, computer software and applications, etc.) with their colleagues at non-profit institutions for research purposes, the materials should be transferred under a Material Transfer Agreement (MTA). MTAs are binding legal agreements between the provider of research material and the recipient, which set forth the conditions of transfer and use, protect proprietary interest in the material, and restrict distribution. Most importantly, the MTA requires the recipient to indemnify the provider from any liability arising from the use of the material. Executing an MTA also helps to preserve the faculty and University's intellectual property rights while recording the transfer of the invention to another party.
When is an MTA necessary?
MTA's are necessary any time a researcher at the University wishes to send or receive materials of a confidential or proprietary nature; material that is infectious, hazardous or subject to special regulations; material for which the provider is concerned about potential liability; or material for which the provider wishes to obtain rights to the results of the research in which the material or information is to be used.
Who can sign an MTA?
Those at UMSL who are authorized to sign MTAs include 1) Tamara Wilgers, Director, IP Management & Commercialization; 2) Chris Spilling, Vice Chancellor; and 3) Kristin Sobolik, Chancellor. Many MTAs ask for the researcher to sign the MTA, which is acceptable if the signature is to confirm that the researcher has read and understood the terms of the MTA. However, MTAs are agreements between the Curators of the University of Missouri and the Provider or Recipient — the researcher is not a party to the agreement. As the University is the party to the agreement, only individuals authorized to sign such agreements on behalf of the Curators have the authority to bind the University to an MTA.
What happens if someone without authority signs the MTA?
In the worst-case scenario, the unauthorized signatory would be held personally bound to the terms of the agreement. Most likely, when the unauthorized signature is discovered, the ORA will have to notify the other party and then proceed with negotiations to arrive at an agreement that can be signed by the University.
What is the Uniform Biological Material Transfer Agreement (UBMTA)?
The Uniform Biological Material Transfer Agreement (UBMTA) was developed by the Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM) in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control to facilitate transfers of materials between NIH-funded researchers and, more generally, for transfers between academic institutions. Institutions that are a signatory to the Master Agreement are able to transfer materials under the terms of the UBMTA simply by sending a simple letter agreement. The University of Missouri is a signatory to the Master Agreement.
Are there any alternatives to using an MTA?
For materials that are commercially available, the option of purchasing those materials may be considered. Sometimes, obtaining a material through an MTA will be problematic but purchasing the material will bypass the issues. At other times, pursuing sponsored research with a company will be a viable alternative to a MTA.
How might using materials obtained from other academic institutions or companies affect my research and IP rights?
Materials are obtained from other academic institutions and companies using MTAs. Through these agreements, the provider often receives the ability to review manuscripts, abstracts and the like prior to submission and to practice any inventions made with the materials for internal research purposes free-of-charge. In addition, the provider often receives the first right to commercialize any intellectual property arising from the UMSL research involving the materials. Other terms, such as confidentiality provisions and restrictions on transferring modified materials, also may affect your research/intellectual property rights.
Therefore, the potential for third-party conflict and colliding interests exists, particularly if the research is being performed with sponsored research funding or if materials from multiple sources are commingled in the same research program.
It is important to work closely with the IP Management & Commercialization staff handling your laboratory’s MTAs, Collaboration Agreements, and/or Sponsored Research Agreements. Unfortunately, the potential for conflict and colliding interests can, at times, prevent an agreement from being acceptable to the University.
Who can sign an NDA?
Those at UMSL who are authorized to sign NDAs include 1) Tamara Wilgers, Director, IP Management & Commercialization; 2) Chris Spilling, Vice Chancellor; and 3) Kristin Sobolik, Chancellor. NDAs are agreements between the Curators of the University of Missouri and the Discloser or Recipient — the researcher is not a party to the agreement. As the University is the party to the agreement, only individuals authorized to sign such agreements on behalf of the Curators have the authority to bind the University to an NDA.
Chancellor Kristin Sobolik has redelegated signature authority for the UMSL campus as shown below for the noted IP and research-related agreements. The person listed first is your primary contact; following names are backup if the primary contact is unavailable.
- Non-disclosure agreements, confidentiality agreements and proprietary information agreements: Tamara Wilgers, Christopher Spilling
- License agreements or option agreements:
- involving University-owned inventions or plant varieties, regardless of whether patented or unpatented: Tamara Wilgers
- involving University-owned trademarks, service marks, trade dress, or other similar rights: Tamara Wilgers, Christopher Spilling
- involving University-owned copyrightable works (including software and mask works): Tamara Wilgers, Christopher Spilling
- Official correspondence and agreements with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and foreign patent offices relating to patent applications and patents: Tamara Wilgers
- Official correspondenceand agreements with the USPTO relating to trademark applications or registrations: Tamara Wilgers, Christopher Spilling
- Official correspondence and agreements with the United States Copyright Office relating to copyright applications or registrations for copyrightable works (including software or mask works): Tamara Wilgers, Christopher Spilling
- Government licenses, confirmation forms and other forms related tointellectual property required by federal agencies: Tamara Wilgers, Christopher Spilling
- Material transfer agreements: Tamara Wilgers, Christopher Spilling
- Interinstitutional agreements related to intellectual property jointly owned by the parties thereto: Tamara Wilgers
- Allocation of intellectual property rights agreements related to SBIR and/or STIR agreements: Tamara Wilgers, Christopher Spilling
- Assignment of intellectual property from University employees, students or third parties to the University, including but not limited to (a) assignment of patent rights by inventor(s) to the University and (b) assignment of copyrights by authors/creators to the University: Tamara Wilgers, Christopher Spilling
- MOUs, authors' agreements for copyrighted works (including software and mask works), or other agreements involving author royalty/revenue sharing: Tamara Wilgers, Christopher Spilling
- Visiting scientist, visiting scholar, or visiting fellow agreements: Christopher Spilling, Steven Berberich
- Joint faculty appointment agreements: Christopher Spilling, Steven Berberich
- Affiliation agreements, consortium agreements, collaboration agreements, and cooperative agreements: Christopher Spilling, Steven Berberich
- Research proposals, grant award agreements, sponsored research agreements (including both government-sponsored and industry sponsored):
- Involving an assignment of University owned intellectual property: Christopher Spilling
- Involving a commercial license of University-owned intellectual property: Christopher Spilling, Tamara Wilgers
- Not involving anassignment or commercial license of University-owned intellectual property: Christopher Spilling, Steven Berberich
- Consulting agreements or personal services agreements relating to services or work performed by third parties involving research or intellectual property analysis and/or commercialization: Tamara Wilgers, Christopher Spilling
- Fee-for-service agreements for research-related projects the University performs for third parties:
- Involving an assignment of University-owned intellectual property: Christopher Spilling
- Involving a commercial license of University-owned intellectual property: Tamara Wilgers, Christopher Spilling
- Not involving an assignment or commercial license of University-owned intellectual property: Tamara Wilgers, Christopher Spilling
- Sponsored academic course agreements involving research or intellectual property involving non-employee students:
- Involving an assignment of University-owned intellectual property: Christopher Spilling
- Involving a commercial license of University-owned intellectual property: Christopher Spilling, Tamara Wilgers
- Not involving an assignment or commercial license of University-owned intellectual property: Christopher Spilling, Tamara Wilgers, Steven Berberich
- Assignment of University-owned intellectual property rights (e.g., waiver of University-owned inventions back to university inventors): Christopher Spilling
- Endorsements, advertising, use of University name associated with the campus, or other approvals pursuant to Section 330.015.H and Section170.040 of the Collected Rules and Regulations: Christopher Spilling, Steven Berberich
Last updated June 06, 2022.