Accreditation

Accreditation by the Council on Social Work Education (CSWE) is a rigorous process that ensures degree programs establish and maintain high standards of education. CSWE’s Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards (EPAS) establish social work programs’ structure and curriculum so every student graduating from a social work program should have the same basic skills and knowledge.

The baccalaureate curriculum is built on a liberal arts perspective and provides professional content, including the knowledge, values, processes, and skills deemed essential for professional practice. Graduates should possess a beginning professional level of proficiency in the knowledge and skills needed for self-critical and accountable practice.

Social work education at the master’s level is also built upon a liberal arts perspective. It includes required professional foundation content and one or more advanced practice concentrations designed to teach students advanced analytic and practice skills sufficient for self-critical, accountable, and ultimately autonomous practice in relevant professional areas.

Adapted from: Council on Social Work Education, Directory of colleges and universities with accredited social work degree programs, September 2001.

Bachelors of Social Work Student Outcomes

Summary of the Program’s Assessment Plan | Generalist Practice

Assessment Measure #1: (Field Evaluation)

Dimension(s) assessed:
Knowledge, Skills, Values, Cognitive & Affective Processes

When/where students are assessed:
Each semester, final field evaluation

Who assessed student competence:
Field Instructor

Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1–9:
2.5 out of 4

Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1–9:
80%


Assessment Measure #2: (Embedded Course Assignments)

Dimension(s) assessed:
Knowledge, Skills, Values, Cognitive & Affective Processes

When/where students are assessed:
Each semester, individual designated assignments

Who assessed student competence:
Instructors

Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1–9:
70%

Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1–9:
80%


Assessment Data Collected During the Academic Year (2024–2025)

BSW In‑Person and Virtual Cohort Results by Competency

Competency 1: Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior

  • BSW In‑Person Cohort: 89%
  • BSW Virtual Cohort: 100%

Competency 2: Advance Human Rights and Social, Racial, Economic, and Environmental Justice

  • BSW In‑Person Cohort: 100%
  • BSW Virtual Cohort: 100%

Competency 3: Engage Anti-Racism, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (ADEI) in Practice

  • BSW In‑Person Cohort: 97%
  • BSW Virtual Cohort: 100%

Competency 4: Engage in Practice-Informed Research and Research-Informed Practice

  • BSW In‑Person Cohort: 90%
  • BSW Virtual Cohort: 100%

Competency 5: Engage in Policy Practice

  • BSW In‑Person Cohort: 93%
  • BSW Virtual Cohort: 89%

Competency 6: Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities

  • BSW In‑Person Cohort: 96%
  • BSW Virtual Cohort: 100%

Competency 7: Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities

  • BSW In‑Person Cohort: 94%
  • BSW Virtual Cohort: 91%

Competency 8: Intervene with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities

  • BSW In‑Person Cohort: 94%
  • BSW Virtual Cohort: 91%

Competency 9: Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities

  • BSW In‑Person Cohort: 95%
  • BSW Virtual Cohort: 89%

MSW Assessment of Student Outcomes

Summary of the Program’s Assessment Plan | Generalist Practice

Assessment Measure #1: [Final Field Evaluation, SW 5800]

Dimension(s) assessed:
Knowledge, Skills, Values, Cognitive & Affective Processes

When/where students are assessed:
Foundation Practicum

Who assessed student competence:
Field Instructor

Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1–9:
3.0 out of 4.0

Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1–9:
90%


Assessment Measure #2: [Class Assignments]

Dimension(s) assessed:
Knowledge, Skills, Values, Cognitive & Affective Processes

When/where students are assessed:
Each semester, individual designated assignments

Who assessed student competence:
Course Instructors

Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1–9:
80%

Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1–9:
90%


Summary of the Program’s Assessment Plan | Specialized Practice

Area of Specialized Practice #1: Family Practice

Assessment Measure #1: [Final Field Evaluation, SW 6850]

Dimension(s) assessed:
Knowledge, Skills, Values, Cognitive & Affective Processes

When/where students are assessed:
Specialization Practicum

Who assessed student competence:
Field Instructor

Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1–9:
80%

Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1–9:
90%


Assessment Measure #2: [Embedded Course Assignments]

Dimension(s) assessed:
Specialization Coursework
Knowledge, Skills, Values, Cognitive & Affective Processes

When/where students are assessed:
Specialization Coursework

Who assessed student competence:
Course Instructors

Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1–9:
80%

Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1–9:
95%


Area of Specialized Practice #2: Leadership and Social Change

Assessment Measure #1: [Final Field Evaluation, SW 6850]

Dimension(s) assessed:
Knowledge, Skills, Values, Cognitive & Affective Processes

When/where students are assessed:
Specialization Practicum

Who assessed student competence:
Field Instructor

Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1–9:
80%

Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1–9:
90%


Assessment Measure #2: [Embedded Course Assignments]

Dimension(s) assessed:
Knowledge, Skills, Values, Cognitive & Affective Processes

When/where students are assessed:
Specialization Coursework

Who assessed student competence:
Course Instructors

Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1–9:
80%

Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1–9:
95%

Overall Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes

(Aggregate Findings for All Students from All Program Options Combined) 1  

Assessment Data Collected during the Academic Year (2024-2025)

MSW Program Competency Results — AY 2024–2025
Competency MSW In‑Person Cohort MSW Virtual Cohort In‑Person: Family Practice Practicum Virtual: Family Practice Practicum In‑Person: Leadership & Social Change Virtual: Leadership & Social Change
Competency 1: Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Competency 2: Advance Human Rights and Social, Racial, Economic, and Environmental Justice 100% 100% 94% 100% 100% 100%
Competency 3: Engage Anti‑Racism, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (ADEI) in Practice 92% 100% 94% 100% 100% 100%
Competency 4: Engage in Practice‑informed Research and Research‑informed Practice 97% 100% 88% 100% 100% 100%
Competency 5: Engage in Policy Practice 99% 90% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Competency 6: Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities 100% 91% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Competency 7: Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities 100% 91% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Competency 8: Intervene with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities 100% 91% 88% 100% 100% 100%
Competency 9: Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities 100% 96% 81% 100% 100% 100%