The Phoenix Solution: Secrets of a Lost Civilisation

by Alan E. Alford

Reviewed by Acharya S

In The Phoenix Solution: Secrets of a Lost Civilisation, British author Alan Alford brings novel and interesting insights into the "lost civilization" theory made famous by Plato nearly 2,500 years ago. By his own description a "non-expert," Alford began his quest with a study of the mysteries of the Pyramids and Sphinx of the Giza plateau; soon he was encountering hidden knowledge which revealed, in his words, "that the match between mythology and astronomy is somewhat on the order of 100 per cent." Alford concludes that such knowledge was precise enough to suggest a lost, pre-historic culture of tremendous advancement.

Alford starts his story with the mysterious Sphinx, the date of which has lately been challenged and pushed back thousands of years, ostensibly based on geological observations. This view, of course, is rejected by orthodox Egyptologists, who are not prepared to accept its implications: To wit, that a technologically advanced culture existed eons before the current era of human history. This rejection continues despite the tantalizing evidence presented by such mavericks as von Daniken, John Anthony West, Graham Hancock and Robert Bauval. As Alford points out, it seems unreasonable that the orthodoxy denies the antiquity of Egyptian culture while embracing that of other cultures.

Regarding the Sphinx itself, Alford reiterates the fact that its head is too small for its body and the hypothesis that it had been recarved, possibly millennia after the original, which may have been a lion or, possibly, a dog. As concerns the Great Pyramid, Alford points out that it seems to have been built at the same time as the Sphinx and posits that it is the oldest pyramid in Egypt. The new date of the Great Pyramid thoroughly disturbs the orthodoxy and raises perplexing questions as to construction methods, questions that have always existed, since the Pyramid is among the most astounding feats of engineering ever devised by human hands - how much more astonishing is this feat if pushed back several centuries or millennia?

In his analysis of the age of the Pyramid, Alford dissects and dispenses with the "evidence" of it having been constructed by the 4th Dynasty Pharaoh, Khufu, or Cheops, "discovered" by English traveler Col. Howard Vyse, who claimed to have found "inscriptions" hidden in the "construction chambers" above the so-called King's Chamber. These inscriptions, Alford concludes, are bogus, an opinion concurred with by this reviewer. He also disposes of the cherished notion that all Egyptian pyramids were built as tombs, a belabored opinion that should in all reasonableness be put to rest. Reiterating the words of Bauval, Alford says, " . . . the Great Pyramid has a complexity akin to some giant machine which is beyond our comprehension." To turn the Great Pyramid into a "tomb" built by a megalomaniacal Pharaoh using slave labor degrades it tremendously and buries its magnificent secrets under a mound of the mundane.

Alford hypothesizes that the Great Pyramid, Sphinx and other "ooparts" ("out-of-place-artifacts") were not built by 4th Dynasty kings but were adopted by later dynasties, an idea that causes great distress to Egyptian Egyptologists, who have loathed the idea that anyone but the known Egyptian state built the Great Pyramid, because it implies that another race was involved. It is worthwhile mentioning that the current Egyptian people is not the same as the ancient, so this ethnic pride should not be a factor in any case. Alford asks, "Is it so crazy to suggest that the unique design of the Great Pyramid was a legacy from an earlier, more advanced culture?" He then continues, "In my view, it is certainly less crazy than continuing to believe that the Pyramid was constructed as a tomb for a dead king, and that he built this totally over-engineered and revolutionary wonder of the world with absolute perfection at the first attempt." While marveling at its construction, however, Alford refrains from ascribing this wonder of engineering to "aliens" with superior technology, as is one popular theory of today.

In his examination of the ancient Egyptian religion, although not an expert, Alford does a decent job, apparently without the benefit of the important body of work produced by such extraordinary mythicists and experts on Egyptian religion as Gerald Massey, Albert Churchward and Barbara Walker. Alford also displays astute insight as to the duplicity and chicanery of priests, who deliberately change myths in order to establish their superiority over rivals. Whereas so many before him have utterly failed to appreciate the cosmic, rather than mundane and historical, significance of the Egyptian myths, Alford steps up to the plate and gets a hit, although he stumbles and misses the mark on a number of highly important aspects. "Could these 'gods,'" he asks, "represent celestial bodies and their cycles?" - an query to which this reviewer says, "Amen!" If, however, Alford had encountered the works of those great scholars mentioned above, he would not have needed to ask this and other questions, such as whether the enigmatic "Ennead" were the nine planets, because he would have more clearly seen that the ancient Egyptian religion is a version of the ubiquitous, standardized celestial mythos that revolves around the daily, monthly, annual and equinoctial movements of the known heavenly bodies such as the sun, moon, stars and planets, rather than unknown bodies and cosmic cataclysms à la Velikovsky and Sitchin, towards whose work Alford fortunately later turns a critical eye. This initial error and oversight undermines Alford's main thesis, however, and makes a significant portion of his book tedious to read, with Alford himself failing to live up to the principle of Occam's Razor ("invent no unnecessary hypotheses"). Alford nevertheless brings some new and valuable insight into Egyptian religion and, by extension, that of many other parts of the world, and assists in restoring the monumental, cosmic significance of these myths, which have been dismissed and denigrated by later cultures. Also, he does get briefly back on track when he attempts to synthesize the "exploding planet hypothesis" with the important celestial mythos, as well as with his short discussion of freemasonry; for, it is within the secrets of masonry that we will find many of the answers to our questions about ancient and modern cultures. It is masons who built the pyramids and who created the celestial mythos that has been the basis of nearly every religion, as they were also master astrologers, not just astronomers, who encoded their extensive knowledge within the Great Pyramid, which thus serves as a "cosmic computer," as well as a temple of great importance.

This awesome cosmological understanding, then, cries out for the explanation provided by the Lost Civilization Theory. In explaining this lost, technologically advanced culture, Alford suggests that it may have consisted of "wandering nomads" of the type we would expect of space explorers. This nomadic theory would explain why there is little evidence of a "full-blown" civilization at Giza that would allow for an early date for its construction. "Why should we assume that the Sphinx and Pyramids were the brainchild of 'local' sedentary cultures?" he asks, and then continues, "Perhaps we should instead be searching for a wandering race who eschewed the idea of the organised state, being motivated instead by something other than power and vainglory."

In sum, this reviewer enjoyed Alford's book, as it combines scholarship with creative thinking, providing some reasonable solutions to the flaws of both the orthodox and unorthodox opinions concerning these great mysteries of human history. Especially enjoyable is his insistence upon restoring to the ancients their proper level of wisdom and advancement, long subordinated by culturally biased "experts" who have depicted these peoples as little more than cavemen who "accidentally" blundered upon the ability to create amazing and mesmerizing tales and megalithic buildings.

Acharya S is a classically trained archaeologist, historian, mythologist, linguist and expert on the celestial mythos. She is the author of three books, Paradise Found, The Aquarian Manifesto, and The Christ Conspiracy: The Greatest Story Ever Sold. Her website is Truth Be Known.