clinically significant because of relatively small vertical vergence compensatory ranges<1 prism diopters can be important
right or left hyperphoria (no hypo's)
can be mildly noncomitant
PREVALENCE
Scobee & Bennett: Maddox rod, 1500 patients
35% >= 1/2 prism diopters
"9% clinically significant symptoms"
SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS
blurred vision
diplopia
headache
varied location (frontal or occipital)panoramic
being in a crowdriding in a train or car
watching movies or TV
concentrating on sports activity
asthenopia
associated systemic problems
fatigue, back pain, vertigo, dizzinessnausea, motion sickness
anomalous head position
reduced binocular VA relative to monocular
narrow zone of SSBV
DIAGNOSIS
cover test
von Graefe
Maddox rod
fixation disparity
vertical vergence range asymmetry
O.D. supravergence 5/2O.D. infravergence 3/1
primary gaze vs. downgaze
near point vs. distance
DIAGNOSTIC OCCLUSION
at home; in office
MANAGEMENT DECISION BASED ON:
symptoms
VDT use
uncorrected refractive error
accompanying accommodative or vergence anomaly
MANAGEMENT
vertical prism
neutralize the heterophoriaRx 1/2 the heterophoria
balance the vertical vergence ranges
O.S. supravergence 6/2O.S. infravergence 4/2
1 prism diopter BD O.S.
associated phoria
Rx 1/2 the associated phoria
prism adaptation
in-office trial period for 10-15 minutesanisometropia
calculate the spectacle induced vertical prismslab off (BU); slab on (BD)
orthoptics
some enlargement of vertical vergence ranges possibleusually in combination with prism