AXIOZAZZZZZAAzs4. 444. Axiomatic Set Theory - A brief formal introductionMS OF SET THEORY

We start with A Brief History of Set Theory

The Zermelo-Fraenkel Axioms (ZF)

Axiom ZF1 - Sets with the same members are equal - (Extensionality).

If x and y are sets then x $\QTR{Large}{=}$ y $\QTR{Large}{\iff }$ MATHz (z$\QTR{Large}{\in }$x $\QTR{Large}{\iff }$ z$\QTR{Large}{\in }$y $\QTR{Large}{)}$.

MATHx MATHy $\QTR{Large}{(}$x $\QTR{Large}{=}$ y $\QTR{Large}{\iff }$ MATHz (z$\QTR{Large}{\in }$x $\QTR{Large}{\iff }$ z$\QTR{Large}{\in }$y $\QTR{Large}{))}$

 

Axiom ZF2 - The "Empty Set" is a set. We write it as MATH

There exists a set MATH such that MATHx(MATH(x MATH)).

MATHyMATHx(MATH(x MATHy))

Note by ZF1 MATH is unique.

 

Axiom ZF3 - Set Formation - Unordered Pairs.

If x,y are sets then there exists a set z such that

MATHa $\QTR{Large}{(}$a$\QTR{Large}{\in }$z $\QTR{Large}{\iff }$ $\QTR{Large}{(}$a $\QTR{Large}{=}$ x or a $\QTR{Large}{=}$ y$\QTR{Large}{))}$

MATHxMATHyMATHzMATHa $\QTR{Large}{(}$a$\QTR{Large}{\in } $z $\QTR{Large}{\iff }$ $\QTR{Large}{(}$a $\QTR{Large}{=}$ x or a $\QTR{Large}{=}$ y$\QTR{Large}{)))}$.

Notation: We write this unique set as {x,y} . Note that {x,x} which is the same as {x} is not the set x.

 

Axiom ZF4 - Set Formation - Union.

If x is a set then there exists a set y such that

MATHa MATHy$\QTR{Large}{(}$ a$\QTR{Large}{\in }$y $\QTR{Large}{\iff }$ MATHz$\QTR{Large}{(}$ z$\QTR{Large}{\in }$x and a$\QTR{Large}{\in }$z $\QTR{Large}{))}$.

Notation: We write yMATHx , or some variant thereof

 

Axiom ZF5 - Set Formation - Power set.

If x is a set then there exists a set z such that

MATHy$\QTR{Large}{(}$ y$\QTR{Large}{\in }$z $\QTR{Large}{\iff }$ yMATHx $\QTR{Large}{)}$.

MATHxMATHzMATHy $\QTR{Large}{(}$ y$\QTR{Large}{\in }$z $\QTR{Large}{\iff }$ MATHa (a$\QTR{Large}{\in }$yMATH a$\QTR{Large}{\in }$x ) )

Notation: MATHa (a$\QTR{Large}{\in }$yMATH a$\QTR{Large}{\in }$x ) is just a definition of inclusion yMATHx

 

Axiom ZF6 - Set Formation - Selection.

If z and $\QTR{bs}{\Phi (}$x$)$ is a proposition then there exits a set y such that

MATHx(x$\QTR{Large}{\in }$y $\QTR{Large}{\iff }$ $\QTR{Large}{(}$x$\QTR{Large}{\in }$z and $\QTR{bs}{\Phi (}$xMATH.

MATHzMATHyMATHx$\QTR{Large}{(}$x$\QTR{Large}{\in }$y $\QTR{Large}{\iff }$ $\QTR{Large}{(}$x$\QTR{Large}{\in }$z and $\QTR{bs}{\Phi (}$xMATH.

Note that this avoids Russell's Paradox since we require x to be a member of a "known Set."

Notation:We write y$\QTR{Large}{=\{}$x$\QTR{Large}{\in }$z MATHxMATH.

 

Axiom ZF7 - There is an infinite Set

There exists a Set m such that MATHm and MATHx$\QTR{Large}{(}$x$\QTR{Large}{\in }$m MATH $\QTR{Large}{(}$xMATHxMATHm$\QTR{Large}{))}$.

MATHmMATHm and MATHx$\QTR{Large}{(}$x$\QTR{Large}{\in }$m MATH $\QTR{Large}{(}$xMATHxMATHm$\QTR{Large}{)))}$

Translation:$\qquad $x$\QTR{Large}{\cup }${x} is the Set containing all the members of x and the Set x itself.

A Computation:

Step:0 MATHm

This Set has zero members.

1MATHm

Since MATH ,this set has one member, the Set with 0 members.

2MATHm

This set has two members, the Set with 0 members, a Set with 1 member.

3MATHm

This set has three members, the Set with 0 members, a Set with 1 member and a Set with 2 members.

.

.

n

ZF7 allows us to "construct" the natural numbers.

 

Axiom ZF8 - Replacement( Functional Image)

Let MATHx$\QTR{Large}{,}$y$\QTR{Large}{)}$ be a proposition.

Suppose MATHx$\QTR{Large}{(}$ MATHyMATHyMATHx$\QTR{Large}{,}$yMATH and MATHx$\QTR{Large}{,}$yMATH $\QTR{Large}{(}$yMATHyMATH $\QTR{Large}{))}$

That is, MATHx$\QTR{Large}{,}$y$\QTR{Large}{)}$ is a "single valued function."

then

MATHaMATHbMATHc $\QTR{Large}{(}$ c$\QTR{Large}{\in }$b $\QTR{Large}{\iff }$ MATHd$\QTR{Large}{(}$d$\QTR{Large}{\in }$a and MATHd$\QTR{Large}{,}$c$\QTR{Large}{)))}$

Translation: The functional image of a Set is a Set.

$\vspace{1pt}$

MATHx$\QTR{Large}{(}$ MATHyMATHyMATHx$\QTR{Large}{,}$yMATH and MATHx$\QTR{Large}{,}$yMATH $\QTR{Large}{(}$yMATHyMATH MATH

MATHaMATHbMATHc $\QTR{Large}{(}$ c$\QTR{Large}{\in }$b $\QTR{Large}{\iff }$ MATHd$\QTR{Large}{(}$d$\QTR{Large}{\in }$a and MATHd$\QTR{Large}{,}$c$\QTR{Large}{))))}$

 

Axiom ZF9 - There are not Russell's Paradox like Sets (Regularity).

If x is a set and x $\QTR{Large}{\neq }$ MATH then MATHy $\QTR{Large}{(}$y$\QTR{Large}{\in }$x and MATHa MATHa$\QTR{Large}{\in }$x and a$\QTR{Large}{\in }$y$\QTR{Large}{))}$.

MATHx$\QTR{Large}{(}$x $\QTR{Large}{\neq }$ MATHy $\QTR{Large}{(}$y$\QTR{Large}{\in }$x and MATHa MATHa$\QTR{Large}{\in }$x and a$\QTR{Large}{\in }$y$\QTR{Large}{)))}$

Translation: Every non-empty set contains a member that does not any members in common with it.

Note MATHa( MATH(a$\QTR{Large}{\in }$x and a$\QTR{Large}{\in }$y)). can be read x$\QTR{Large}{\cap }$yMATH. This can be shown to rule out the Russell set.

To be continued.