Information Systems
College of Business Administration
University of Missouri - St. Louis

Customer Relationship Management Links


Salesforce CRM
Applications
Success Stories


From Knowledge@Emory, January 29 - February 11, 2003.

Why Some Companies Succeed at CRM (and Many Fail)

What makes some companies so much better at managing customer relationships than their competitors? Put a different way, how are companies like Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Pioneer Hi-bred Seeds, Fidelity Investments, Lexus, Intuit, and Capital One able to stay more closely connected to customers than their rivals, in ways that significantly influence the profitability of the firm? It’s a question that Wharton marketing professor George Day answers in a new paper. His research offers, among other things, three distinct approaches to customer relationship management (CRM), each with dramatically different results. http://knowledge.emory.edu/articles.cfm?catid=4&articleid=637


From IntelligentCRM Email Bulletin, Volume 2, Issue 2, January 22, 2002.

I-CRM FEATURE: CRM RESURRECTION: Five golden rules for revitalizing moribund initiatives in a glacial economy January 14, 2002; by Jill Dyché

This feature takes a long, hard look at CRM and obtains input from IT strategists on the front lines of CRM implementation. However, instead of just dwelling on what's wrong with CRM, this article offers advice on how to recognize CRM problems and fix floundering initiatives. Visit the Web version for exclusive Web-only content on the five steps for revitalizing CRM, seven CRM warning signs, and five techniques for jump-starting a CRM project. For more detail, view online story.

FEATURE: "Failsafe: 10 Steps to CRM Payback": Focusing on these goals during implementation can save your organization a lot of time and money in the end December 5, 2001; by Jay-Louise Weldon http://www.intelligententerprise.com/011205/418feat3_1.shtml.

TAKING ON B2B EXTRANETS FROM Transform Magazine: December 2001 by Lowell Rapaport http://www.transformmag.com/db_area/archs/2001/12/tfm0112cc.shtml.

TAILOR CONTENT FOR A PERSONAL TOUCH FROM Transform Magazine: November 2001 by Michael P. Voelker http://www.transformmag.com/db_area/archs/2001/11/tfm0111f2.shtml.


From eBizStrategies, January 17, 2002:

1. CUTTING THE FAT FROM CRM IMPLEMENTATION: Station Casinos Inc. and other companies are seeking to reduce implementation costs for customer relationship management systems. Analysts say that implementation charges--payouts for integration, customization, networking and training, among other things--can easily spiral to four times the cost of the CRM software itself. That reality has become difficult for enterprises to swallow, given the limp economy and the well-documented fact that about half of all CRM implementations fizzle. To read the story, click here

2. STANDARDS MAY FIX CRM INTEGRATION: Software customization, training, maintenance and license fees aren't the only things that raise the cost of CRM deployments. Integration, experts say, can also be a major, costly challenge. That's because, in most large enterprises, customer information is captured and stored in multiple systems. Bringing it all together for analysis in a customer resource management system usually involves time-consuming integration using proprietary APIs provided by CRM and other enterprise software vendors. To read the story, click here.

3. BARTON GOLDENBERG: CAPPING CRM IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: Until recently, implementing CRM software meant either engaging an implementation company that has been trained and/or certified by the vendor or using internal IT resources. Neither choice is optimal. To read Barton Goldenberg's column, click here.


From eBizStrategies, June 15, 2001:

CRM FORCES E-BUSINESS TO GET SERIOUS ABOUT DATA QUALITY After years of neglecting data quality or investing millions of dollars and hundreds of man-hours to manually clean up and rework data in a stopgap fashion, many companies are finally getting serious about data quality. And for many of them, CRM is the driver. Unlike with earlier generations of back-office systems where inconsistent data merely drove up costs, in e-business, where you're dealing directly with customers, miscues resulting from faulty or incomplete data can drive away business in an instant, experts say. It's not surprising, then, that data quality is starting to command the attention of top management instead of being passed off to IT. Many e-businesses today are putting board-approved data management and quality strategies in place. To read the story, click here: http://eletters1.ziffdavis.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eIhe0Bf5ip0DSr0I110Ad


Exploration Warehouse


CRM by the Slice.


HARRAH'S PLACES ITS CRM BET (from eBiz Strategies [eBiz_Strategies@eletters1.ziffdavis.com], April 5, 2001): Customer relationship management technologies are paying off like a loose slot machine for the Harrah's casino chain, delivering increased gaming revenues and customer loyalty. While many competitors are relying on extravagant rooms and entertainments, Harrah's is using CRM to track and analyze the behaviors and preferences of its customers as they rove the casino floor in search of a hot slot machine--or even as they travel from one of the company's 21 clubs to another. Harrah's has expanded its Total Rewards program, which uses coded ID cards to collect information about gamers' preferences, into a full-blown CRM initiative by adding information from other sources such as the company's hotel reservation systems to get a more complete view of customers. To read the story, click here: http://eletters1.ziffdavis.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eHbR0Bf5ip0DSr0CLb0AN


Crm Market to Grow to $11.9 Billion by 2005, Report Says


CRM VENDORS PULL STRING ON SPEECH, by Gina Fraone -- (from eBiz Strategies [eBiz_Strategies@eletters1.ziffdavis.com])

When toy manufacturer Mattel Inc. decided decades ago that little girls would love dolls that could talk, they were right. The company's Chatty Cathy doll, first produced in 1959, was an instant success with baby boomer girls. Subsequent generations were equally enamored.

And remember Texas Instruments' Speak and Spell, the toy that spoke to kids as they practiced their spelling? Most consumers in 1978 probably didn't care that this was the first toy to use integrated circuits to create a replica of the human vocal tract. It was just cool to have a toy that talked.

Consumers have historically shown a natural affection for devices that speak like humans, so it's no wonder that several CRM (customer relationship management) product vendors at DCI's annual CRM conference last week were trying to seduce attendees with the power of speech. Some were showing products that allow salespeople to interact with CRM applications by talking to them. Others were touting applications that allow Web sites to interact with consumers using speech.

Although the idea of applying speech to CRM in this way makes sense, many of these new products suffer from two problems: Speech recognition technology still has holes, and speech-driven applications require more bandwidth than many networks and Web sites can muster.

Two products being demonstrated at the DCI show illustrated these shortcomings. JustTalk, of Ann Arbor, Mich., offers a product that integrates with CRM software so that traveling sales folks can capture, access and share data using speech recognition technology over any phone.

And LipSinc, of Morrisville, N.C., helps businesses create "virtual agents" that can interact with Web site visitors to provide one-way automated voice responses or give live two-way visual communication. LipSinc can even create a digital image of an employee or other character that will interact with Web site visitors.

Gimmicks aside, I found performance lacking in these new applications.

The JustTalk application is a bit slow and awkward. Although I think JustTalk is onto a great idea, the company's speech-recognition technology has trouble understanding regional and ethnic accents. The software seems to work best when the speaker uses only certain word patterns and short phrases. The problem is that such speaking patterns are unnatural, and many users won't take the time to get the hang of working with JustTalk.

I also visited a few sites employing LipSinc's digital character technology. Yes, I was completely charmed when a digital, multidimensional-looking Kermit the Frog greeted me at one site. However, despite the fact that I was accessing the site from eWEEK's office using a robust corporate network, Kermit lost his voice in the ether and was unable to tell me more about the wonders of his site. Maybe the little frog creature wasn't adequately motivated. (What are they paying you, Kermie?)

The application of speech recognition to CRM will certainly work once the kinks in speech technology and network bandwidth are ironed out. In the meantime, however, most users will get more out of a pull on Chatty Cathy's string.

To read more about JustTalk, click here: http://eletters1.ziffdavis.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eGzT0Bf5ip0DSr0B4H0Av

To read more about LipSinc, click here: http://eletters1.ziffdavis.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eGzT0Bf5ip0DSr0B4I0Aw


Two statements about User Interfaces found at Creative Good Experience.


"Making It Personal" by Dennis Callaghan, eWeek (11/27/00) Vol. 17, No. 48, P. 1:

Personalization software has become a popular addition to retail Web sites, with vendors vying to sell collaborative filtering and artificial intelligence applications. Lands' End, a catalog apparel retailer, launched a relatively simple personalization application on its Web site last month, called My Personal Shopper. The program guides customers to an outfit they might like by comparing two styles side-by-side, or by asking their preference in fabric or colors. Meanwhile, SmarterKids.com is using an interactive forms system to help parents shop for their children. Parents of the 170,000 children profiled at the site have spent 60 percent more than parents who do not use the guide. Many companies are also using customer dialogue to guide their recommendations; a common approach is to ask customers to fill out questionnaires on their interests. Letting the customer control their experience at the site is a more effective use of personalization, says Laurie Windham, CEO of e-business consultancy Cognitiative. "Effective use of personalization is about building a better relationship with the customer, not trying to fool the customer into doing something they don't want to do." Online superstore Buy.com has seen a large conversion rate increase since implementing collaborative filtering personalization software from E.piphany. Vice president of customer support Travis Fagan says that customer dialogue is important to the company as well, depending on the product sold. For items like notebooks and PCs, a questionnaire is better to personalize an offering, but for entertainment categories, suggestive selling applications and engines prove more useful. http://www.zdnet.com/eweek/stories/general/0,11011,2657469,00.html


INGRAINED BUSINESS BEHAVIORS WORK AGAINST CRM, by Jeff Moad
(appeared in eBiz Strategies [eBiz_Strategies@eletters1.ziffdavis.com], March 2, 2001)

Who doesn't want to get closer to customers? In an e-world where your competitor is just a click away, cozying up to your best customers and offering personalized information and services online that make it hard for them to leave may be the quickest path to sustainable competitive advantage.

Indeed, in a recent survey of 800 IT and business executives by Meta Group, of Stamford Conn., 55 percent said "improving customer intimacy" is one of their company's top three business priorities. Another 36 percent placed that goal in their top 10.

If the statements by CIOs and other IT execs attending Meta's annual Metamorphosis West conference in San Diego this week paint a true picture, many enterprises expect to achieve their customer intimacy goals by investing in new CRM (customer relationship management) applications and business processes. CRM strategy sessions were packed with executives, many of whom said they have large, active CRM initiatives under way. Dow Chemical Co., in Midland, Mich., for example, has launched a large, enterprisewide CRM initiative, said Erwin Tien, senior systems architect.

But new research by Meta indicates those enterprises have a long way to go to reach the nirvana of customer intimacy, even if they've already begun deploying a CRM application package from one of the many vendors jockeying for position in the marketplace. Why? Many organizations have a lot of old organizational barriers to break down and new integration work to do in order to make their CRM efforts truly customer-driven, Meta researchers reported.

The goal of CRM at most enterprises is to produce a single, unified view of customer behavior, preferences and profitability by integrating customer data gleaned from every distribution channel and customer touch point across the enterprise. But, reported Meta, most CRM efforts today are driven by a single function within the enterprise, such as sales, marketing or service. That, analysts said, is partly due to organizational politics. Functional groups at many companies are often uncomfortable sharing customer information with other functional groups. The result, Meta research found, was that many CRM efforts are, in fact, failing to produce a single, unified view of the customer and are not, in fact, customer-driven.

One answer to this problem, said Meta Group Executive Vice President Aaron Zornes, is to create a dedicated cross-functional organization to drive CRM efforts and to have it headed by a high-level executive--perhaps with the title of Chief Customer Officer--who reports to the CEO. In fact, said Zornes, 40 percent of Global 2000 companies are planning to create what he called a dedicated CRM project management office.

Another major CRM challenge that most enterprises will face revolves around integration, Meta officials said. Compiling, analyzing and acting on a unified view of customer information will require that existing customer systems and databases be integrated. At the same time, because no packaged application addresses all of the CRM features and functions that will be required by most enterprises, integration between packaged applications will be a major feature of CRM. In fact, Zornes said, Meta research shows that 60 percent of CRM project costs will be attributable to integration. And, for most companies, the cost of deploying CRM will exceed the cost of implementing notoriously expensive enterprise resource management applications.

But, according to Meta research, most enterprises have only begun to integrate customer information. In the survey, 67 percent of the 800 executives said their companies do not effectively integrate customer data from multiple touch points.


Some articles on CRM
The E-Business of Operational CRM
The Customer Relationship Management Ecosystem
Compaq's Customer Relationship Management
MetaGroup CRM
Best Buy to Use Net Perceptions' In-depth Reporting and Analysis to Help Drive Merchandising Decisions


The CRM Ecosystem


CRM: SOLUTIONS DRIVE ANALYTICAL APPS MARKET, by Gina Fraone
(appeared in eBiz Strategies [eBiz_Strategies@eletters1.ziffdavis.com], January 29, 2001)

The tentacles of customer relationship management are numerous and far-reaching. The latest market segment to feel its strong prodding is analytical applications.

Revenue for the analytical applications market was expected to grow from $2 billion in 1999 to more than $6 billion in 2000, according to International Data Corp., in Framingham, Mass. Of that $6 billion, more than $2 billion was expected to come from the CRM segment.

The driver? A major component of CRM is collecting and analyzing data from across the enterprise to improve customer relations. As a result, the study says, both new and established companies are in need of analytical applications that will perform those tasks.

Ford rebuilds its IT engine for e-business: After taking a hard look at its IT organization, Ford realized it wasn't ready for customer-focused e-business. So the company launched a top-to-bottom overhaul of its IT engine.

For more information, see the article in PC Week.


| UM-St. Louis Home Page | College of Business Page | IS Home Page |



Page Owner: Professor Sauter (Vicki.Sauter@umsl.edu)
© Vicki L. Sauter. All rights reserved.