RESEARCH CRITIQUE CHECKLIST *
Criteria |
Met |
Not Met |
Comments |
|
Researcher qualifications |
|
|
|
|
|
Qualifications included |
|
|
|
Qualifications appropriate |
|
|
||
Funding source identified |
|
|
||
Sponsoring group identified |
|
|
||
Title of Research Article |
|
|
|
|
|
Clear |
|
|
|
Concise |
|
|
||
Contains population |
|
|
||
Contains major variables |
|
|
||
Abstract |
|
|
|
|
|
100 to 200 words in length |
|
|
|
Problem/purpose |
|
|
||
Hypothesis(es) or research question(s |
|
|
||
Description of subjects |
|
|
||
Design |
|
|
||
Instruments |
|
|
||
Methods |
|
|
||
Major findings |
|
|
||
Introduction |
|
|
|
|
|
Study topic explored |
|
|
|
Background information on problem provided |
|
|
||
Study purpose(s) identified |
|
|
||
Reader interest attracted |
|
|
||
Importance to nursing stressed |
|
|
||
Problem statement |
|
|
|
|
|
Clear |
|
|
|
Single Stated in a declarative or interrogatory sentence form |
|
|
||
Contains population |
|
|
||
Contains major variable(s) |
|
|
||
Empirically testable |
|
|
||
Ethical |
|
|
||
Feasibility of study apparent |
|
|
||
Significance to nursing apparent |
|
|
|
Criteria |
Met |
Not met |
Comments |
Review of the Literature |
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Concise |
|
|
||
Logically organized |
|
|
||
Relevant sources cited |
|
|
||
Current sources included |
|
|
||
Classical sources included |
|
|
||
Varying points of view presented |
|
|
||
Primary sources cited |
|
|
||
Sources critically appraised |
|
|
||
Documentation of sources completed |
|
|
||
Theoretical/Conceptual Framework |
|
|
|
|
|
Relevant to problem of study |
|
|
|
Concepts defined |
|
|
||
Relationship between concepts presented |
|
|
||
Assumptions |
|
|
|
|
|
Identified |
|
|
|
Appropriate for study |
|
|
||
Hypothesis and Research Questions |
|
|
|
|
|
Clear |
|
|
|
Concise |
|
|
||
Written in a declarative sentence |
|
|
||
Contains population |
|
|
||
Contains variables |
|
|
||
Reflects the problem statement |
|
|
||
Based on the theoretical/conceptual framework |
|
|
||
Deductions from theory are logical |
|
|
||
Contains only one prediction |
|
|
||
Empirically testable |
|
|
||
Definition of Terms |
|
|
|
|
|
Identified conceptually |
|
|
|
Identified operationally |
|
|
||
Reflect the hypothesis(es) |
|
|
||
Based on theoretical/conceptual framework |
|
|
||
Research Design |
|
|
|
|
|
Identified |
|
|
|
Described |
|
|
||
Appropriate to hypothesis(es) or research questions |
|
|
||
Threats to validity or extraneous variables controlled |
|
|
|
Criteria |
Met |
Not met |
Comments |
||||
Setting |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Described |
|
|
|||||
Appropriate for study |
|
|
||||||
Population and Sample |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Target population identified |
|
|
|||||
Accessible population identified |
|
|
||||||
Sampling method listed |
|
|
||||||
Sampling method described |
|
|
||||||
Sampling method appropriate |
|
|
||||||
Sample characteristics listed |
|
|
||||||
Sample size adequate |
|
|
||||||
Sample representative of population |
|
|
||||||
Potential sampling biases identified |
|
|
||||||
Subject dropout discussed |
|
|
||||||
Protection of subjects’ rights discussed |
|
|
||||||
Data-collection Methods |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Method appropriate |
|
|
|||||
Description of What data were collected |
|
|
||||||
How data were collected |
|
|
||||||
Who collected the data |
|
|
||||||
Where data where collected |
|
|
||||||
When data were collected |
|
|
||||||
Data-collection Instruments |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Identified |
|
|
|||||
Described |
|
|
||||||
Appropriate for study |
|
|
||||||
Reflect variables in hypothesis(es) |
|
|
||||||
Scoring procedures discussed |
|
|
||||||
Validity reported and adequate |
|
|
||||||
Reliability reported and adequate |
|
|
||||||
Pilot study results reported |
|
|
||||||
Data Analysis |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Presented in text |
|
|
|||||
Presented in tables |
|
|
||||||
Data presented for each hypothesis |
|
|
||||||
What statistics tests were used |
|
|
||||||
Appropriate statistics presented: Descriptive |
|
|
||||||
Inferential |
|
|
|
Criteria |
Met |
Not met |
Comments |
Discussion of findings |
|
|
|
|
|
Placed in context of framework tested |
|
|
|
Findings compared to results in literature |
|
|
||
Statistical significance discussed |
|
|
||
Clinical significance discussed |
|
|
||
Limitations of study recognized |
|
|
||
Implications |
|
|
|
|
|
Identified |
|
|
|
Take into consideration study limitations |
|
|
||
Consistent with previous research findings |
|
|
||
Conclusions |
|
|
|
|
|
Clear |
|
|
|
Concise |
|
|
||
Reflect study results |
|
|
||
Appropriate for population and sample |
|
|
||
Recommendations |
|
|
|
|
|
Identified |
|
|
|
Take into consideration study limitations |
|
|
||
Consistent with previous research findings |
|
|
||
Other Considerations |
|
|
|
|
Format follows the research process |
||||
Appropriate writing style |
|
|
||
Correct grammar and sentence structure |
|
|
||
Limited use of complex and technical words |
|
|
||
Cited references appear in reference list |
|
|
Adapted from Niesdwiadomy, R.M. (1993). Foundations of Nursing Research (2nd. Ed.). Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.