IS
6891 Largely fostered by the
globalization of organizations and spread of the Internet, processing
standards, and common software packages, organizations now regularly source
business and IT services globally. This course covers topics to help managers source business and IT services from the initiation
of a sourcing decision and evaluation process through supplier selection and
transition to outsourcing. The
course also covers the client and supplier capabilities and contractual and relational
governance that are needed to ensure good outsourcing outcomes for both
parties. Although the course
focuses on global sourcing of IT work because this is the most mature market,
the global sourcing of other back office functions including finance, HR,
procurement, real estate, legal, and other functions are also covered. Students
will also investigate insourcing options such as shared services and captive
centers and other emerging sourcing topics such as cloud computing, freelance
outsourcing, and rural sourcing.
Dr.
Mary C. Lacity
233 Computer Center Building
(314) 516-6127 (work)
(314) 516-6827 (fax)
Email: Mary.Lacity@umsl.edu
Homepage: http://www.umsl.edu/~lacitym
Dr. Mary Lacity is a Professor of Information Systems and an
International Business Fellow at the University of Missouri-St. Louis. She is also Co-Chair of the IAOP Midwest
Chapter, Industry Advisor for the Outsourcing Angels, Associate
Researcher at The Outsourcing
Unit, London School of Economics, Senior Editor of the Journal of Information
Technology, Co-editor of the Palgrave Series: Work,
Technology, and Globalization, and on the Editorial Boards for MIS
Quarterly Executive, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Strategic
Outsourcing: An International Journal, and Journal of the Association
for Information Systems (JAIS). Her research focuses on global
outsourcing of business and IT services. She has conducted case studies and surveys of
hundreds of organizations on their outsourcing and management practices. She
has given executive seminars world-wide and has served as an expert witness for
the US Congress. She was the recipient of the 2008 Gateway to Innovation Award
sponsored by the IT Coalition, Society for
Information Management, and St. Louis RCGA and the 2000 World Outsourcing Achievement
Award sponsored by PricewaterhouseCoopers and Michael Corbett and Associates. She has published 12 books, most recently China’s
Emerging Outsourcing Capabilities (Palgrave, 2010; co-editors Leslie
Willcocks and Yingquin Zheng); Information
Systems Outsourcing: Theory and Practice (Palgrave, 2009; coauthor:
Leslie P. Willcocks) and Offshore
Outsourcing of IT Work, (Palgrave, 2008; coauthor Joe Rottman). More
than 50 of her publications have appeared in the Harvard Business Review,
Sloan Management Review, MIS Quarterly, IEEE Computer, Communications
of the ACM, and many other academic and practitioner outlets. She was
Program Co-chair for ICIS 2010. Before earning her Ph.D. at the
University of Houston, she worked as a consultant for Technology Partners International
and as a systems analyst for Exxon Company, USA.
This course is cross-listed
in the Outsourcing Professional Course Catalog (OPCC)
This course is worth 25 of the 150 points required to
become a Certified Outsourcing Professional (COP).
The International Association of Outsourcing
Professionals (IAOP) offers a number of certifications, including the
COP-Certified Outsourcing Professional.
To become a Certified Outsourcing Professional (COP), an individual must
be able to demonstrate both the experience and knowledge needed to design,
implement, and manage outsourcing initiatives with a high probability of
achieving the organization's intended outcomes. The experience and knowledge
areas addressed by the certification cover the non-domain specific activities
common to outsourcing as a management practice irrespective of the individual's
role as a customer, provider, or advisor. In so doing, the certification
creates an experience and knowledge set common to and shared by all
professionals in the field.
What is the process for becoming a COP? Applicants will be asked to successfully demonstrate that they possess the necessary knowledge and experience to be considered a COP. This knowledge and experience can be demonstrated through a combination of the following:
Comprehensive Work
Experience in the field of outsourcing as demonstrated by
employment on one or more projects across one or more firms.
Knowledge Assessment through passing the multiple choice COP Examination
developed by the Standards Committee. The exam is taken online and consists of
200 multiple choice questions. You must answer 70% of the questions correctly
to pass.
Education including
successful completion of
the COP Master Class and/or holding a relevant post-graduate degree.
http://www.iaop.org/content/23/193/1706/
|
|
Outsourcing
Professional Body of Knowledge, by International Association of
Outsourcing Professionals (2010), Van Haren
Publishing
|
|
|
The Outsourcing
Enterprise: From Cost Management to Collaborative Innovation (2011), by Leslie
Willcocks, Sara Cullen, and Andrew Craig, Palgrave, UK
|
|
|
Additional assigned readings, videos, and
pre-recorded lectures as posted on my gateway
|
|
Assessment Item |
Percentage of Grade |
Due Date |
Exam I (Take Home)
|
25%
|
Tuesday, April 19 by 8:30am
|
|
Group Presentation |
40%
|
See Schedule
|
|
Exam II (Take Home) |
25%
|
Thursday, June 2 by 8:30am
|
|
Class Participation |
10%
|
The class will be divided into six groups.
Each group is responsible for presenting a 60 minute presentation to the class.
Each group will be assigned a different ITO/BPO topic:
IAOP homepage: http://www.iaop.org/
IAOP Midwest Chapter:
http://www.outsourcingprofessional.org/content/23/162/1947/
Everest Research Institute http://www.everestresearchinstitute.com/
Technology Partners International: http://www.tpi.net/
LSE Outsourcing Unit: www.outsourcingunit.org
Journals devoted to outsourcing:
Academic Journal: Strategic
Outsourcing: An International Journal
PRESENTATION
TIMING:
Each group should spend their time in
approximately the following way: (Again, some topics lend themselves to a
slightly different format, so be sure to look at my links to your topic.)
Overview of the
topic. Provide general statistics about your
topic; why is your topic important to general managers? How much money do
companies spend on your topic? What are the promised benefits of this topic if
properly managed? What are the
potential pitfalls if mis-managed? What will we learn
from your presentation? (~10 minutes)
If you cite surveys, YOU MUST TELL US ABOUT
THE SAMPLE in terms of size of organizations that participated (such as Fortune
500), geographic dispersion (such as U.S. or global), sample size, and date of
data collection. You'll be
surprised how surveys report very different figures because of sample
diversity.
Case-based/Interview-based Data: Explain your topic
using real organizations. Why did
you select these organizations? How
are they representative of the lessons you are trying to demonstrate? (~30
minutes)
Generalizations: Do a cross-case
comparison of similarities and differences among the cases. Extract a set of
lessons or best practices for the general manager; tie these lessons back to
the case studies. The audience
should be able to be very involved in this part of the presentation. (~10
minutes)
Each group should only plan 50 minutes of
content to allow 10 minutes of audience interaction during the presentation. Think
of yourselves not as formal speakers, but as teachers. You should incorporate
the audience during the entire presentation. In the past, students have done very
creative things for audience participation including a short Jeopardy game, a
short survey, etc.
|
Group |
Oral
Presentation File Name File names are case sensitive |
Group 1: BPO: Outsourcing Human
Resources OR Financial & Accounting Services
|
G1pmbaesiS11.pptx |
Group
2: BPO: Group Choice (Procurement Outsourcing, Claims Administration; Policy
Administration; Legal Services—anything except HR or FAO)
|
G2pmbaesiS11.pptx |
Group
3: Insourcing Options: Shared
Services or Captive Centers
|
G3pmbaesiS11.pptx |
Group
4: Emerging ITO/BPO Trend: Niche Sourcing to unlikely places
|
G4pmbaesiS11.pptx |
Group
5: Emerging ITO/BPO Trend: Cloud Computing
|
G5pmbaesiS11.pptx |
Group
6: Emerging ITO/BPO Trend: Freelance Outsourcing
|
G5pmbaesiS11.pptx |
Make sure that every slide appropriately credits sources, be it an interview, printed
material, or web site. Printed material should be referenced with Author, Year,
Title, Journal (if appropriate), Volume, Number, and page numbers. For example:
Book:
Lacity, M., and Willcocks, L. (2001), Global Information Technology
Outsourcing: Search For Business Advantage, John
Wiley & Sons,
Journal Article:
Rottman,
J., and Lacity, M. (2008), “A US Client’s Learning from Outsourcing
IT Work Offshore,” Information
Systems Frontiers, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 259-275.
If your slides get too busy, then simply use
end notes, such as embedding (1) on actual slide and attaching a list with
numbers:
(1) Lacity, M., and Willcocks, L. (2001), Global
Information Technology Outsourcing: Search For
Business Advantage, John Wiley & Sons,
(2)
Rottman, J., and Lacity, M. (2008), “A US Client’s Learning from Outsourcing
IT Work Offshore,” Information
Systems Frontiers, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 259-275.
(3) Ibid, p. 184.
Websites:
Please indicate full URL for web site
references, and date viewed. For example:
www.umsl.edu/~lacity/ms480sum.htm, viewed
January 1, 2009.
Interviews:
Please indicate name (if not anonymous),
title of interviewee, type of interview (in person, phone, videoconference),
name of students at the interview, and date of interview. For example:
John Smith, CIO of BigCompany, interviewed in person by Jane Doe and Fred
Davis, January 6, 2009.
Ian Jones, Director
of Applications, BigCompany, interviewed by phone by
Jane Doe and Fred Davis, February 8, 2009.
DO
NOT PLAGERIZE!!!!
You may not copy directly from sources unless
you indent the text and put it in quotes.
This would normally be reserved for a few sentences of specific
quotations.
You must RE-WORD sources! You are using external references as
INPUT to your originally created OUTPUT.
I take this very seriously and any student
who copies directly from the web or printed sources will be turned over to
Academic Affairs.
I am very happy to work with groups on their
specific topic. I strongly suggest that I meet with your groups
several times. At a MINIMUM, I want to review your power point slides at least a week
before your presentation. Please feel free to email me to make an
appointment in person, or we can do it over the phone as well.
Oral presentations
are graded as a group grade rather than as individual grades. Oral group presentations will be graded
using the following form: oral group grade form pmba
Individuals in a group
never contribute the exact equal amounts of time, content, and value. This
often leads to some people feeling they worked more than others, and some
people feeling left out. Usually a leader emerges, one who will hopefully help
find the gifts of each individual. Unfortunately, I cannot effectively
intervene in these matters, and rely on you as adults to ensure that all
members of your group meaningfully contribute to the data gathering,
interviewing, analysis, slide design, and presenting the final project.
All group members will receive the same grade
for the oral presentation, provided that all members agree that each individual
made a significant contribution. If a group member has not meaningfully or
fully participated, I will assume that group member was legitimately distracted
by other life issues such as illness or heavy work travel. I do expect that
members who do not fully participate show their integrity by willingly reducing their percentage of contribution.
It is no shame to not fully participate because of legitimate reasons. It is a great shame to expect other
group members to falsely report contribution percentages.
In order to provide some accountability,
albeit imperfect, I will ask that each group fill in the following form and
each group member must sign it. This form is due on the day of presentation.
Please print, fill
in, and have every member sign a copy of: group contribution form .
PLEASE USE ASSIGNMENT FEATURE IN MYGATEWAY.
Formatting Requirements for Written
Assignments:
Please clearly mark
each page with your name.
Please use font size
11 or font size 12 for normal text.
Please use one inch
margins.
Please include page
numbers.
Grading Exams:
Exams are due at the
dates and times as indicated above. 10 points are deducted for each day
late. Exams are considered 1 day
late at 8:31am.
There is no
“double grading” (i.e. no asking to redo an exam if a student is
not satisfied with the grade earned).
There are no extra credit assignments.
Each exam has an
assessment sheet that I will use for grading. By having access to this grading sheet
for each exam, students will be better able to check that each exam meets
requirements.
Grading Philosophy:
My grading philosophy
is that professors do not “give” grades. Students “earn” grades. I take grading very seriously. I thoughtfully grade each assessment item
on the assessment sheets. A
sub-culture has emerged among some
(certainly not all) graduate students that graduate students are
“customers” and that every thing they do
should be given an A. Such a view
dilutes the value of your education, and as a professor I cannot possibly hold
this view. I am morally obligated
to clearly define expectations (which I do on a very detailed syllabus and
detailed assignments), to help you as much as I can before your assignments are
due, and to grade the actual performance using the assessment sheets.
I must treat and
assess each student the same—fairly and consistently. I cannot make exceptions for some
students. All that said, I have great empathy for college students, having been one
myself for nine years! I care
about your learning. No one would be happier than I to see all students earn high grades!
DATE:
|
Time
|
Activity/Module
|
Learning
Objectives
|
Required
Readings
|
CLASS
Saturday,
March 12
|
1:30pm to 3:30pm
|
Overview of Global Outsourcing
|
Understand definition of global sourcing; Understand challenges facing back office
managers; Understand the major transformation
approaches; Understand size of global outsourcing
markets; Understand outsourcing success rates; Understand why outsourcing is so challenging
to client organizations; Learn
what clients need to master to achieve global sourcing objectives
|
|
3:45pm to 5:30 pm
|
What Suppliers Would Tell Customers if They Could
|
Understand that most of what BPO suppliers
say is supported by research and will ultimately benefit the customer. |
|
|
READ!
March
12
to
April
11
|
|
20 Years of Outsourcing Research Summarized
|
Understand
the determinants of outsourcing decisions;
Understand
the determinants of outsourcing outcomes
|
The meaty academic version: Lacity, M., Khan,
S., Yan, A., and Willcocks, L. (2010), “A Review of the IT Outsourcing
Empirical Literature and Future Research Directions,” Journal of Information Technology, Vol.
24, 4, pp. 395-433. OR The practitioner version: Lacity, M., Khan,
S., and Willcocks, L. (2009), “A Review of the IT Outsourcing
Literature: Insights for Practice,” Journal
of Strategic Information Systems, Vol 18, pp.130-146. |
|
|
Motivations to Outsource: Moving to the Strategic
Agenda
|
Understand
most common motives driving ITO and BPO decisions;
Understand
five reasons why CEOs should pay attention to ITO and BPO
|
Outsourcing
Professional Body of Knowledge, IAOP, Van Haren Publishing,
CHAPTER 1 |
|
|
The
Outsourcing Enterprise: From Cost Management to Collaborative Innovation (2011), CHAPTER 1 |
||||
|
|
Transaction Attributes
|
Understand
three main transaction attributes—Asset
Specificity, Frequency, and Uncertainty—and how these relate to
outsourcing choices.
Understand
two behavioral assumptions of TCE—bounded rationality and vendor
opportunism.
Understand
main benefits and limitations of three governance choices: hierarchy, hybrid,
and market.
|
Practitioner Friendly Version of
Transaction Cost Economics: “Oliver’s
Twist” in Globalization Today
(2010), |
|
|
Reading Classic: Williamson, O.
(1991), “Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete
Structural Alternatives,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.
36, 2, pp. 269-296. |
||||
|
|
Decision Process
|
Understand nine building blocks of the outsourcing
life cycle. Ability to
identify top global ITO and BPO suppliers; Appreciate how
quickly country and supplier advantages change. |
Outsourcing Professional Body of Knowledge,
IAOP, Van Haren Publishing, CHAPTERS 5 and 6. |
|
|
Cullen, S., Seddon, P., and Willcocks, L.,
“Managing Outsourcing: The Life Cycle Imperative,” MIS
Quarterly Executive, Vol. 4, 1, March 2005, pp. 229-246. (Also in Chapter 1 of The Outsourcing Enterprise.) |
||||
|
IAOP List of Top
Global Suppliers |
||||
CLASS
Thursday,
April 7
|
1:30 pm-3:15 pm
|
Transaction Cost Economics and other Theories of
Outsourcing as they relate to practice
|
Understand
how well TCE explains ITO;
Understand
other outsourcing theories and how these relate to ITO and BPO
|
Optional
Reading : The Original Work: DiMaggio, P., and
Powell, W. (1991), "The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism
and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields," in , (Powell &
DiMaggio eds), The University of Chicago Press, pp. 63-82. |
3:30 pm to 4:30 pm
|
Guest Speaker: Real Estate Outsourcing
|
Rich Etzkorn, CPM, RPA Executive Managing Director,
Principal Corporate Services, Cassidy Turley
|
|
|
4:30 pm to 5:30pm
|
Guest Speaker:
Value Health Check Survey
|
Matt Shocklee, President
and CEO, Global Sourcing Optimization Services (GSOS), LLC; Global
Ambassador-International Association of Outsourcing Professionals
|
|
|
CLASS
Saturday,
April
9
|
1:30 pm to 3:30pm
|
Sourcing Destinations: Offshore Outsourcing
|
Ability to
identify major countries competing in ITO and BPO; Understand
how offshore outsourcing is different than onshore outsourcing in terms of
risks and additional costs;
Best
practices associated with engaging offshore suppliers and rural suppliers.
|
Rottman,
J., and Lacity, M. (2006), “Proven Practices for Effectively Offshoring
IT Work,” Sloan Management Review,
Vol. 47, 3, pp. 56-63 Rottman,
J., and Lacity, M. (2008), “A US Client’s Learning from
Outsourcing IT Work Offshore,” Information
Systems Frontiers, Special Issue on Outsourcing of IT Services, Vol. 10,
2, pp. 259-275. |
EXAM
DUE:
Tuesday,
April 19, 8:30am |
||||
CLASS:
Thursday,
May 4
|
1:30 to
2:30 pm
|
Group 1 Presentation
|
BPO: Outsourcing Human Resources OR
Financial & Accounting Services
|
|
2:45 to 3:45pm
|
Group 2 Presentation
|
BPO: Group Choice (Procurement Outsourcing, Claims
Administration; Policy Administration; Legal Services—anything except HR
or FAO)
|
|
|
4:00 to 5:00pm
|
Group 3 Presentation
|
Insourcing Options: Shared Services or Captive Centers
|
|
|
CLASS:
Saturday,
May 7
|
1:30 to
2:30 pm
|
Group 4 Presentation
|
Emerging ITO/BPO Trend: Niche Sourcing to
unlikely places
|
|
2:45 to 3:45pm
|
Group 5 Presentation
|
Emerging ITO Trend: Cloud Computing
|
|
|
4:00 to 5:00pm
|
Group 6 Presentation
|
Emerging ITO/BPOTrend:
Freelance Outsourcing
|
|
|
READ!
May 7
to
May 27
|
|
Rural Outsourcing
|
Understand
how rural suppliers select locations, attract, develop and retain human
capital, and
create
value;
|
Lacity,
M., Rottman, J., and Khan, S. (2010), “Field of Dreams: Building IT
Capabilities in Rural America,” Strategic
Outsourcing: An International Journal,
Vol. 3, 3. pp. 169-191.
|
|
|
Client Firm Capabilities
|
Understand
nine core client capabilities
|
The Outsourcing Enterprise: From
Cost Management to Collaborative Innovation (2011),
CHAPTER 4
|
|
|
|
Supplier
Firm Capabilities
|
Understand
twelve core supplier capabilities
|
The
Outsourcing Enterprise: From Cost Management to Collaborative Innovation (2011), CHAPTER 3
|
|
Optional reading: Feeny, D., Lacity, M., and Willcocks, L. (2005),
“Taking the Measure of Outsourcing Providers,” Sloan Management Review, Vol. 46, 3,
pp. 41-48. (The contents are replicated in Chapter 3.)
|
||||
|
|
Contractual Governance
|
Understand
how to develop the financial case and pricing;
Understand
the governance charter;
Understand
contract management
|
Outsourcing
Professional Body of Knowledge, IAOP, Van Haren
Publishing, CHAPTERS 7 and 8
|
|
The
Outsourcing Enterprise: From Cost Management to Collaborative Innovation (2011), CHAPTERS 6, 7, and 8
|
||||
|
|
Relational Governance
|
Understand
what is meant by relational governance;
Understand
Social Capital Theory and how it relates to ITO
|
Lacity, M. and Rottman, J. (2008), Offshore Outsourcing of IT Work,
Palgrave, United Kingdom, Chapter 4.
|
|
EXAM
DUE:
Thursday,
June 3,
8:30
am
|
||||