Grade
Form For Summary Presentations:
Student
Name: Theory
Covered:
Oral
Presentation:
1. Individual adequately covered the major constructs and
hypotheses of the theory by using a clearly understood visual model:
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Beyond Words |
Unaccept- Able |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Major improve- ment |
Some Improve- ment |
Solid |
Well Done |
Out-standing |
Best Speaker
on this dimension |
2. Individual adequately summarized the empirical tests
of the theory by using clearly understandable visuals:
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Beyond Words |
Unaccept- Able |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Major improve- ment |
Some Improve- ment |
Solid |
Well Done |
Out-standing |
Best Speaker
on this dimension |
3. Individual provided a critical assessment of the theory’s
assumptions:
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Beyond Words |
Unaccept- Able |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Major improve- ment |
Some Improve- ment |
Solid |
Well Done |
Out-standing |
Best Speaker
on this dimension |
4. Individual used the 25 minutes effectively (you will
be cut off after 25 minutes, so practice your timing!)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Beyond Words |
Unaccept- Able |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Major improve- ment |
Some Improve- ment |
Solid |
Well Done |
Out-standing |
Best Speaker
on this dimension |
5. Individual provided useful suggestions in terms of
future research questions or methods
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Beyond Words |
Unaccept- Able |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Major improve- ment |
Some Improve- ment |
Solid |
Well Done |
Out-standing |
Best Speaker
on this dimension |
6. Individual used material above and beyond class
reading and material I provided:
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Beyond Words |
Unaccept- Able |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Major improve- ment |
Some Improve- ment |
Solid |
Well Done |
Out-standing |
Best Speaker
on this dimension |
7. Individual communicated clearly:
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Beyond Words |
Unaccept- Able |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Major improve- ment |
Some Improve- ment |
Solid |
Well Done |
Out-standing |
Best Speaker
on this dimension |
8. Individual spoke in a natural voice and did not read
or memorize a "script":
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Beyond Words |
Unaccept- Able |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Major improve- ment |
Some Improve- ment |
Solid |
Well Done |
Out-standing |
Best Speaker
on this dimension |
9. Individual demonstrated enthusiasm for the topic:
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Beyond Words |
Unaccept- Able |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Major improve- ment |
Some Improve- ment |
Solid |
Well Done |
Out-standing |
Best Speaker
on this dimension |
10. Individual demonstrated knowledge of the topic:
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Beyond Words |
Unaccept- Able |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Major improve- ment |
Some Improve- ment |
Solid |
Well Done |
Out-standing |
Best Speaker
on this dimension |
Written
Paper:
1. Paper has a meaningful, well positioned introduction:.
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Beyond Words |
Unaccept- Able |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Major improve- ment |
Some Improve- ment |
Solid |
Well Done |
Out-standing: |
Best Paper
in Class |
2. Paper adequately covered the major constructs and
hypotheses of the theory by using a clearly understood visual models:
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Beyond Words |
Unaccept- Able |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Major improve- ment |
Some Improve- ment |
Solid |
Well Done |
Out-standing |
Best Paper
in Class |
3. Paper adequately summarized the empirical tests of the
theory by using clearly understandable visuals:
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Beyond Words |
Unaccept- Able |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Major improve- ment |
Some Improve- ment |
Solid |
Well Done |
Out-standing |
Best Paper
in Class |
4. Paper provided a critical assessment of the theory’s
assumptions:
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Beyond Words |
Unaccept- Able |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Major improve- ment |
Some Improve- ment |
Solid |
Well Done |
Out-standing |
Best Paper
in Class |
5.Paper presented at least 20 external references above
and beyond class reading and material I provided:
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Beyond Words |
Unaccept- Able |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Sub- stantial improve- ment |
Major Improve- ment |
Solid |
Well Done |
Out-standing: |
Best Paper
in Class |
6. Paper was clearly written and grammatically correct:
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Beyond Words |
Unaccept- Able |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Sub- stantial improve- ment |
Major Improve- ment |
Solid |
Well Done |
Out-standing: |
Best Paper
in Class |
7. Paper provided useful suggestions on applying or
modifying the theory in IS context (Likely will be your conclusion.)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Beyond Words |
Unaccept- Able |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Sub- stantial improve- ment |
Major Improve- ment |
Solid |
Well Done |
Out-standing: |
Best Paper
in Class |
8. Paper made effective use of visuals:
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Beyond Words |
Unaccept- Able |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Sub- stantial improve- ment |
Major Improve- ment |
Solid |
Well Done |
Out-standing: |
Best Paper
in Class |
9. Paper was proper length, 10-20 pages single spaced:
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Beyond Words |
Unaccept- Able |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Sub- stantial improve- ment |
Major Improve- ment |
Solid |
Well Done |
Out-standing: |
Best Paper
in Class |
10. Claims in the paper were properly supported:
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Beyond Words |
Unaccept- Able |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Sub- stantial improve- ment |
Major Improve- ment |
Solid |
Well Done |
Out-standing: |
Best Paper
in Class |