Grade Form For Summary Presentations:

 

Student Name:                                       Theory Covered:

 

Oral Presentation:

    

1. Individual adequately covered the major constructs and hypotheses of the theory by using a clearly understood visual model:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Beyond

Words

Unaccept-

Able

Very

Poor

Poor

Major

improve-

ment

Some

Improve-

ment

Solid

Well

Done

Out-standing

 

Best

Speaker on this dimension

 

2. Individual adequately summarized the empirical tests of the theory by using clearly understandable visuals:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Beyond

Words

Unaccept-

Able

Very

Poor

Poor

Major

improve-

ment

Some

Improve-

ment

Solid

Well

Done

Out-standing

 

Best

Speaker on this dimension

 

3. Individual provided a critical assessment of the theory’s assumptions:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Beyond

Words

Unaccept-

Able

Very

Poor

Poor

Major

improve-

ment

Some

Improve-

ment

Solid

Well

Done

Out-standing

 

Best

Speaker on this dimension

 

4. Individual used the 25 minutes effectively (you will be cut off after 25 minutes, so practice your timing!)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Beyond

Words

Unaccept-

Able

Very

Poor

Poor

Major

improve-

ment

Some

Improve-

ment

Solid

Well

Done

Out-standing

 

Best

Speaker on this dimension

 

5. Individual provided useful suggestions in terms of future research questions or methods

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Beyond

Words

Unaccept-

Able

Very

Poor

Poor

Major

improve-

ment

Some

Improve-

ment

Solid

Well

Done

Out-standing

 

Best

Speaker on this dimension

 

6. Individual used material above and beyond class reading and material I provided:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Beyond

Words

Unaccept-

Able

Very

Poor

Poor

Major

improve-

ment

Some

Improve-

ment

Solid

Well

Done

Out-standing

 

Best

Speaker on this dimension

 

7. Individual communicated clearly:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Beyond

Words

Unaccept-

Able

Very

Poor

Poor

Major

improve-

ment

Some

Improve-

ment

Solid

Well

Done

Out-standing

 

Best

Speaker on this dimension

 

8. Individual spoke in a natural voice and did not read or memorize a "script":

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Beyond

Words

Unaccept-

Able

Very

Poor

Poor

Major

improve-

ment

Some

Improve-

ment

Solid

Well

Done

Out-standing

 

Best

Speaker on this dimension

 

9. Individual demonstrated enthusiasm for the topic:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Beyond

Words

Unaccept-

Able

Very

Poor

Poor

Major

improve-

ment

Some

Improve-

ment

Solid

Well

Done

Out-standing

 

Best

Speaker on this dimension

 

10. Individual demonstrated knowledge of the topic:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Beyond

Words

Unaccept-

Able

Very

Poor

Poor

Major

improve-

ment

Some

Improve-

ment

Solid

Well

Done

Out-standing

 

Best

Speaker on this dimension

 

 

Written Paper:

 

 

1. Paper has a meaningful,  well positioned introduction:.                            

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Beyond

Words

Unaccept-

Able

Very

Poor

Poor

Major

improve-

ment

Some

Improve-

ment

Solid

Well

Done

Out-standing:

 

Best

Paper in

Class

 

2. Paper adequately covered the major constructs and hypotheses of the theory by using a clearly understood visual models:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Beyond

Words

Unaccept-

Able

Very

Poor

Poor

Major

improve-

ment

Some

Improve-

ment

Solid

Well

Done

Out-standing

 

Best

Paper in

Class

 

3. Paper adequately summarized the empirical tests of the theory by using clearly understandable visuals:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Beyond

Words

Unaccept-

Able

Very

Poor

Poor

Major

improve-

ment

Some

Improve-

ment

Solid

Well

Done

Out-standing

 

Best

Paper in

Class

 

4. Paper provided a critical assessment of the theory’s assumptions:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Beyond

Words

Unaccept-

Able

Very

Poor

Poor

Major

improve-

ment

Some

Improve-

ment

Solid

Well

Done

Out-standing

 

Best

Paper in

Class

 

5.Paper presented at least 20 external references above and beyond class reading and material I provided:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Beyond

Words

Unaccept-

Able

Very

Poor

Poor

Sub-

stantial

improve-

ment

Major

Improve-

ment

Solid

Well

Done

Out-standing:

 

Best

Paper in

Class

 

6. Paper was clearly written and grammatically correct:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Beyond

Words

Unaccept-

Able

Very

Poor

Poor

Sub-

stantial

improve-

ment

Major

Improve-

ment

Solid

Well

Done

Out-standing:

 

Best

Paper in

Class

 

7. Paper provided useful suggestions on applying or modifying the theory in IS context (Likely will be your conclusion.)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Beyond

Words

Unaccept-

Able

Very

Poor

Poor

Sub-

stantial

improve-

ment

Major

Improve-

ment

Solid

Well

Done

Out-standing:

 

Best

Paper in

Class

 

8. Paper made effective use of visuals:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Beyond

Words

Unaccept-

Able

Very

Poor

Poor

Sub-

stantial

improve-

ment

Major

Improve-

ment

Solid

Well

Done

Out-standing:

 

Best

Paper in

Class

 

9. Paper was proper length, 10-20 pages single spaced:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Beyond

Words

Unaccept-

Able

Very

Poor

Poor

Sub-

stantial

improve-

ment

Major

Improve-

ment

Solid

Well

Done

Out-standing:

 

Best

Paper in

Class

 

10. Claims in the paper were properly supported:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Beyond

Words

Unaccept-

Able

Very

Poor

Poor

Sub-

stantial

improve-

ment

Major

Improve-

ment

Solid

Well

Done

Out-standing:

 

Best

Paper in

Class