Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Tinkering with Technology
(in the classroom)
  • Instructional Technology Conference
  • University of Missouri Kansas City
  • January 7, 2009


  • Robert O. Keel
  • Teaching Professor
  • Department of Sociology
  • UM-St. Louis
2
Meanderings
3
Quick History: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going
  • Spoken Language ~50,000 years ago
  • Written Language circa 4th millennium BCE
  • Moveable Type Printing: 1440 (Chinese ~1100)
  • Telephone: 1875 (telegraph: 1843)
  • Phonograph: 1877
  • Movies: 1890
  • Radio: 1895
  • Television: 1927
  • ENIAC: 1946
  • Internet (ARPANET): 1969
  • WWW: 1991
  • Podcast: 2004
  • 2008: Congressional hearings on “Second Life”
4
The Daily Show: Avatar Heroes, April 7, 2008
5
Who is Coming: Millennials (NetGen)
  • Digital: “I've grown up with technology. I've been on a
    computer from age 5.”1
  • “Devices”
  • Mobile: “A survey of experts shows they expect major tech advances as the phone becomes a primary device for online access, voice-recognition improves, and the structure of the Internet itself improves.”2
  • Interactive
  • Online
  • Multi-channel
6
The Future is NOW
  • Coming to a classroom near you.
7
Online Teens
  • 93% of teens use the internet—more and more as a tool
    for interaction.
  • 64% of online teens engage in content creation.
  • 39% of online teens share their own artistic creations online.
  • 33% create or work on webpages or blogs for others
  • 28% have created their own blog.
  • 27% maintain their own personal webpage.
  • 26% remix content they find online into their own creations.
  • 64% of online teens (59% of all teens) said “yes” to at least one of the above.
  • 55% of online teens ages use Facebook or MySpace.
  • 47% of online teens have uploaded photos online
  • 14% of online teens have posted videos online.
8
Multi-Channel Teens
  • The percent of teens who communicate with their friends every day via these methods…





9
It’s a New World
10
Thinking and Tinkering
  • 1996, Sherry Turkle (Life on the Screen)
    • Computers as "objects to think with."
    • "Computers would not be the culturally powerful objects they are turning out to be if people were not falling in love with their machines and the ideas that the machines carry....Today, the personal computer culture's most compelling objects give people a way to think concretely about an identity crisis. In simulation, identity can be fluid and multiple."1


  • Tinkering with multiple modes of interaction
    • "For planners, mistakes are steps in the wrong direction: bricoleurs navigate through midcourse corrections. Bricoleurs approach problem-solving by entering into a relationship with their work materials that has more the flavor of a conversation than a monologue.“2


11
Teaching, Imagination, and Interaction
  • Teaching Sociology
  • Teaching with Imagination
  • Increasing channels of communication and interaction.1
  • “Collaboration is increasingly seen as critical across the range of educational activities, including intra- and inter-institutional activities of any size or scope. 2
  • “Collaboration Webs. Collaboration no longer calls for expensive equipment and specialized expertise.”3
  • “Collective Intelligence. The kind of knowledge and understanding that emerges from large groups of people is collective intelligence.”4


12
Why Bother?
  • Students today (Fall 2008 UMSL data)
    • Traditional and Non-traditional (median age: 27)
    • Commuters (80%)
  • Most: Computer savvy
    • Own computers (95%)
    • Broadband users (over 85%)
    • Mobile (78% use wireless technology of some sort)
  • Student engagement and interaction
    • Social Learning
    • Flexibility and Accessibility
    • NetGen is coming
    • Post-modernity
  • But not just because…..
13
New isn’t Necessarily Better
14
Blended Learning
  • WWW (release .01) circa 1993
  • MyGateway (Blackboard) circa 2000.  Multiple sections
    combined as one “course.”
  • Asynchronous:
    • Discussion Boards
    • Lecture notes
    • Multimedia
    • Internet Activities
    • Tutorials (StudyMate)
    • Online testing and quizzes (admin)
  • Synchronous:
    • Face-to-Face
    • Wimba Live Classroom
  • Interactive:
    • Group Projects—wikis (another)
    • Real Life Research
15
Acceptance:
  • Courses FS 2008: 2166 “courses” active in MyGateway.
  • Instructors FS 2008: 670 using MyGateway in one or more courses (68%).
  • Students: 11,673 distinct student logins recorded (75% of all registered students).
  • WS 2008 opinion poll of student users of MyGateway.  744 respondents (6.3% of student users).
16
WS 2008 Student Survey: Communication and Interaction
17
WS 2008 Student Survey: Learning
18
WS 2008 Survey: Satisfaction
19
MyGateway Courses and Instructors FS 2000-WS 2008
20
Survey Questions
21
Change over the years: WS02-FS08
22
Students and MyGateway
  • I would suggest that all UMSL professors should be required to use MyGateway to some extent - at least to post the course syllabus, other class documents, assignment deadlines and email contact information.
  • MyGateway is a fantastic tool when teachers actually use it. I like it specifically for the Gradebook. I love knowing exactly where I am at in the class. Unfortunately, only half of my teachers actually record grades. One teacher records grades but long after the actually assignment and the other does not record any grades whatsoever. I think the teachers should be encouraged to use this feature of MyGateway to help the students.
  • I am a 41 year old adult returning student. MyGateway was new to me this semster. I love it! It's a great way to keep in touch with the teacher and other students. I like seeing my grades posted as well. Thanks!
23
Students and MyGateway, 2
  • The ability to access classes online is wonderful. Not only does it allow me to work from home at my own pace, It frees up a lot of time driving back and forth to classes as well as attending the physical classes The major benefit for me with MyGateway is the ability for professors to offer hybrid courses that combine in-classroom with online. This reduces the need for adult working professionals to have to physically come to campus, which often involves taking time away from work responsibilities. …The flexibility this provides to us is greatly appreciated.
  • [When I need] something I can download a copy of that item from the class site. If I don't want to have a lot of paper items I can look at them as I need them on MyGateway. Also, communicating with other students is easier because everyone's email address is located in MyGateway.


24
My Students: Live Classroom
  • Overall the best part of the course was the use of the wimba, it enabled me to not have to be at the campus to attend the lecture.  I really appreciated having it as a resource.
  • “Using wimba is a good tool to review, lecture, and to clarify things..”
  • “I did not use Wimba live to attend the class but I am glad it was available. I have used it to play back for attendance credit only. I would like for this feature to be added to other courses at UM-StLouis.”
  • “The flexibility and convenience of Wimba allowed me to attend EVERY class. In a traditional classroom course, I would have missed at least 4 classes.”
  • “I think that all courses should have the wimba archives available!!!  I travel a lot and it was great to have a class that I could be out of town and still attend.”
  • If it weren't for WIMBA I would not have been able to take this class.  I have taken other "on-line" courses at other colleges and hated them.  The archived "live" classes were great.
25
My Students: Wikis
  • “The wikis are an excellent tool.  Interactive, easy to use, and the final product is better than a group paper would be with graphics and internal links.  Plus, busy group members can input on their own time, rather than trying to find a time and a place to meet.”
  • “More than anything, the wiki's and discussion boards made me feel like it was possible to have a thriving community of connected students that persisted outside of the class. It helped me to identify students like me more easily, by way of the quality of their interactions facilitated by the tools provided.”
  • “I would have liked to see a stronger set of tools for the wiki, perhaps even on a platform with some degree of permanence so that all that work wasn't lost to me upon completion of the course. I do see some downsides to this, but that portion of the course was very addictive for me.”


26
Cautions
  • What if you gave a lecture and nobody came?[i]
  • Motivating Students: Rationalizing Rewards or Rewarding Rationality? (Is this going to be on the test?)
  • Making Something out of Nothing. (“…a social form that is generally centrally conceived, controlled, and comparatively devoid of distinctive substantive content.”[ii])
  • Using Technology or Technology Using You?


27
Techno Dummies
28
Possibilities
  • Openness:
    • Access to information and learning spaces
    • Adjusting to change and adapting to users’ needs
    • Interactivity
    • Choice and multiplicity
  • Transparency:
    • Co-presence, Telepresence, or Simply Presence
  • Community and University:
    • "Essentially, a student's university career in such a system would no longer be through a particular place, time, or preselected body of academics, but through a network principally of their own making, yet shaped by a degree granting body and its faculty.  A student could stay home or travel, mix on-line and off-line education, work in classes or with mentors, and continue their learning long after taking a degree.“ [1]


29
Changing the Frame
  • Virtual----Real: The issues of actuality and ways of being:
    • "The virtual should, properly speaking, be compared not to the real but the actual…It implies the production of new qualities, a transformation of ideas, a true becoming that feeds the virtual in turn.“ [i]
  • Old dichotomies just don't work anymore.
    • Distance Education----Traditional Education: How far away are you?
    • Teacher----Learner: Who knows best?
    • How do you not use technology in education?
    • [i] Pierre Levy, 1998.  Becoming Virtual: Reality in the Digital Age, translated by Robert Bononno, Plenum Trade: New York.  Pages 24-25.
30
The University: Bricks, Information, and Integration.
  • "In looking at university change for its own sake or as an indicator of change more generally, no one should underestimate the remarkable staying power of these institutions.  They have been around...for more than 1,000 years.  In that time, they have survived many revolutions and may survive more yet, including the digital one.“[1]
  • Or, back to chalk?

  • [1] Brown and Duguid, 2000.  Pages 24-241.
31
Contact and Additional Information
  • Robert Keel, rok@umsl.edu
  • This presentation: http://www.umsl.edu/~keelr/tinkering_with_technology_09/tinkering_with_technology_umkc_09.htm (use MS-IE)
  • Review all the MyGateway Students’ and Faculty Surveys http://www.umsl.edu/technology/mgwhelp/mgwinfo/mgwinfo.html.
  • MyGateway Use Statistics: http://mygateway.umsl.edu/umsl/mgwstats/stats.htm