Stimulants
(See: Drugs in American Society, 5th, 6th, 7th editions, Erich Goode, McGraw-Hill, 1999/2005/2008. Chapter 10
and Drugs, Society, and Human Behavior, Ray and Ksir, Mosby, 1993. Chapters 6, 11, and 12.)

Speed Kills!

It's a Scream

Xanthines

Hava Cuppa Java

Caffeine, Theophylline, Theobromine

Coffee: History

A few links:

Tea

Tea Bush

Tea Plant

The Way of  Tea

Wikipedia on Theophylline

Chocolate

Focus on Caffeine (see Ray, p. 303) (See also: Erowid)

Item Caffeine (ave) mg. Caffeine (range) mg.
Drip coffee 5 oz 115 60-180
Percolated coffee 80 40-170
Instant coffee 65 30-120
Brewed decaffeinated 3 2-5
Instant decaffeinated 2 1-5
Brewed U.S. tea 40 20-90
Brewed imported tea 60 25-110
Instant tea 30 25-50
Iced tea 12 oz 70 67-76
Cocoa beverage 5 oz 4 2-20
Chocolate milk 8 oz 5 2-7
Milk chocolate 1 oz 6 1-15
Dark chocolate 20 5-35
Baker's chocolate 26 26
Chocolate (flavored) syrup 4 4
Mountain Dew 54 mg
Mello Yellow 52.8 mg
Coca-cola 45.6
Mr. Pibb 40.8
Dr. Pepper 39.6
Pepsi-cola 38.4
Red Bull 8 mg/oz, 64 mg in a can
Cocaine (the drink) 32 mg/oz, 256 mg in a can (~400 mg/12oz)
Jolt/Nitro about the same as coffee (75mg.)

Consumption

  1. Cancer (not at normally consumed levels)
  2. Breast lumps (benign) (again no firm link)
  3. Large doses seem to be related to birth defects in lab animals
  4. Heart problems: could increase risks
  5. Caffeinism: little real concern for OD, but dependence is common.
  6. Withdrawal: headaches, fatigue, depression.  APA-- considering adding Caffeine dependence Syndrome to list of disorders (Ray, p. 306)
  7. Caffeine and the new "problem drug" for 1999
  8. 2006: Concern developing over consumption of energy drinks
  9. Medicinal use: for premature infants
  10. Most caffeinated city in the USA?

Nicotine

Correlates of Smoking

Smoking and Problems

Cigarette and Tobacco Use 2005 (http://oas.samhsa.gov/NSDUH/2k5NSDUH/2k5results.htm#Ch4)

Current Issues:

DrugsText Information on Nicotine

Yahoo Tobacco Listings

Amphetamines

(Erowid.org, from Indianan University)

Powder methamphetamine is the hydrochloride salt form which is strongly hydrophilic (absorbs water from the air quickly). The HCl salt is smokable as is. "Crystal Meth" or "Ice" refer to methamphetamine grown into crystals. Though many people believe that Crystal Meth is the freebase form of methamphetamine HCl, this is not true. Methamphetamine is smokable in its normal HCL form, but taking the time to grow it into crystals makes it easier to smoke. Meth in visible crystals (rather than powder) is likely to be relatively pure as it is difficult to grow crystals from impure material. Methamphetamine freebase is an oil and is uncommon on the street.

From Erowid, Methamphetamine Basics, Mon, Oct 1, 2001.

Speed Scene: Late 1960s

Methamphetamine, Crystal, Ice, and Speed: Mid 1990s--2010

  1. New York Times Report on Methamphetamine and Crime
  2. Another New York Times Report on Methamphetamine and Crime
  3. NIDA: Information on Methamphtamine
  4. DEA: Information an Methamphetamine
  5. Drug-Free America's Information on "Ice"
  6. NHS: In 2000, the estimated number of persons who have tried methamphetamine in their lifetime was 4.0 percent of the
    population. The estimate has increased significantly since 1994, when 1.8 percent of the population had ever used methamphetamine (yet this is down from 4.3% in 1999).
  7. Current MTF Data
  8. DOJ/DEA Diversion Control
  9. Missouri's Methamphetamine Initiative (Policy Brief- Methamphetamine in Missouri 2004)
  10. The Methamphetamine Project (2005)

Related Substance: Methcathinone (Cat, Kat). Schedule I since 1993.

Amphetamine users in Amsterdam: Patterns of use and modes of self-regulation
by Justus Uitermark and Peter Cohen (http://www.cedro-uva.org/lib/uitermark.amphetamine.html), 2004.

After identifying some omissions in existing literature on research on amphetamine use, this paper sets forth to answer some questions with respect to (1) use patterns, (2) advantages and disadvantages of amphetamine use as experienced by users (3) the formal and informal modes of control that users employ to reduce or negate negative side-effects of amphetamine use, and (4) the role of context variables in fostering in facilitating these modes of control. The paper draws on a sample of 109 experienced and recent amphetamine users in Amsterdam and a follow-up sample of 67 respondents of the original 109.

Conclusion: Although there is no easy way to summarize the findings presented in this paper, we can provide general answers to the five questions posed at the outset. With respect to use patterns, most respondents did not report escalating levels of use over a period of approximately five years. In a clear majority of cases, respondents reduced their level of use or stop using amphetamine altogether after a relatively brief period of time. This helps to explain why most respondents reported only limited negative side effects of amphetamine use, despite their levels of use. Data from our follow-up survey suggest that users tend to develop mechanisms of self-regulation, even those who at some point showed signs of ‘losing control’; respondents either quit or diminish their use or, in rare cases, accommodate high-level amphetamine use within their daily lives.

NHSDUH 2002-2007 Use Rates

MTF: 12th Grade (methamphetamine annual use)(see also, long-term trends)

1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006 2007 2008
% change 06-07
4.7
4.3
3.9
3.6
3.2
3.4
2.5
2.5 1.7 1.2
-0.5

Cocaine

(Erowid.org, By Pedro Luz)

History

2005 National Household Survey

    1979     1988     1994   2005    
  Life Year Month Life Year Month Life Year Month Life Year Month
Cocaine 8.7% 5.5% 2.4% 10.7% 4.1% 1.5% 10% 1.8% .6% 13.8% 2.3% 1%
Crack NA NA NA 1.3% .5% .2% 1.8% .5% .2% 3.3% .6% .3%
  1985 1990 1992 1993 1994
Occasional 4.2% 2.1% 1.7% 1.5% 1.2
Monthly 1.7% 1.0% .7% .7% .6%
Weekly .3% .3% .3% .2% .35%

Current NHSDUH Data

1997 MTF High school Seniors (30 day):

 

Types, Route of Administration, and Effects

(Erowid.org, from Indianan University)

Crack in the News?

Immunization for Cocaine Addiction?

Cocaine and Crack Use Patterns

Ronald Siegel

 

Intranasal: Lines/Spoons

Smokers

Dose

20-50 mg.

100 mg.

Frequency

3-5 hits (approx. 1/4 gram)

1-30 grams (24 hr. period)

Murphy, Reinarman, and Waldorf

The social and health consequences of cocaine use
by Peter Cohen

Presentation held at the Nationale Designerdrogen-und Kokainkonferenz, 3-4 June, 2004, Bern, Switzerland.

<http://www.cedro-uva.org/lib/cohen.social.html>

Crack in the Future?

DrugsText Information on Cocaine

URL: http://www.umsl.edu/~keelr/180/speed.html
Owner: Robert O. Keel rok@umsl.edu
References and Credits for this Page of Notes
Last Updated: Saturday, September 4, 2010 12:44 PM