Writing
about OZ—This Time, It’s Personal!
RUSHDIE
I
wrote my first story in Bombay at the age of ten; its title was Over the Rainbow. It amounted
to a dozen or so pages, dutifully
typed up by my father's secretary on flimsy paper, and eventually it was
lost somewhere on my family's own mazy journeyings
between India, England and Pakistan. Shortly before his death
in 1987 my father claimed to have found
a copy mouldering in an old file, but in spite of my
pleadings he never produced it, and
nobody else ever laid eyes on the thing. I've often wondered about this
incident. Maybe he never really found the story, in which case he had succumbed
to the lure of fantasy, and this was the last of
the many fairytales he told me; or else he did find it, and hugged it to himself
as a talisman and a reminder of simpler times, thinking of it as his treasure,
not mine--his pot of nostalgic, parental gold.
I
don't remember much about the story. It was
about a ten-year-old Bombay boy who one day happens upon a rainbow's beginning,
a place as elusive as any pot-of-gold end-zone, and as rich in promises.
The rainbow is broad, as wide as the sidewalk, and constructed
like a grand staircase. The boy, naturally, begins to climb. I have forgotten
almost everything about his adventures, except for an encounter with a talking pianola whose personality is an improbable hybrid
of Judy Garland, Elvis Presley and the ' playback
singers' of the Hindi movies, many of which made The Wizard of Oz
look like kitchen-sink realism. My
bad memory -- what my mother would call a 'forgettery' – is probably just as
well. I remember what matters. I remember that The
Wizard of Oz (the film, not the book,
which I didn't read as a child) was my very first literary influence. More
than that: I remember that when the possibility of going to school
in England was mentioned, it felt as exciting as any voyage beyond rainbows. It
may be hard to believe, but England felt as wonderful a prospect as Oz.
FRIEDMAN
I was always stricken, as a child, at the moment when the
Wicked Witch in The Wizard of Oz cried, 'I’m mellllting!"
The
shocked anguish on her face, the way she crumpled to the floor-guilt overcame
me. As much as I'd hated her before (and I had: she was cruel and she was voracious. She wanted
everything for herself), suddenly, to my surprise, remorse washed over me, and
painful sympathy: She was my own mother, dissolving!
Quick, she
mustn't be let die! Prop her up! A terrible mistake must have been made! And
the moment I had expected to
feel thrilled triumph (as we would have if this were a boy's story: we're glad
the knight slays the dragon) turned out to be in fact spiked with a baffling
sense of betrayal.
But wasn't
the girl supposed to win? Wasn't the wicked witch evil? And how had my mother
snuck into it all?
DOTY
Like many of you
reading this, I have a long and tangled history with The Wizard of Oz. For the past
thirty-five years or so, Gentlemen Prefer Blondes, I Love Lucy, and Oz have been the
popular culture touchstones for understanding my changing relationship to
gender and sexuality. It all started in the 1960s with the annual televising of
Oz. Watching as a
kid, I loved Dorothy, loved Toto, was scared of, but fascinated by, the Wicked
Witch, felt guilty for thinking good witch Glinda was nerve-gratingly fey and
shrill, thought the Tin Man was attractive and the Scarecrow a big showoff. But
I was really embarrassed by the Cowardly Lion. The supporting cast in Kansas
was boring, with the exception of the sharp-featured spinster Almira (which I
always heard as “Elvira”) Gulch. Only the cyclone could equal this grimly
determined bicyclist and
dog-snatcher for sheer threatening power.
Looking back,
it all makes sense. I was a boy who had a girlfriend who I liked to kiss and to
play Barbies with, while also looking for chances to
make physical contact with her older brother through horseplay in the pool. I
was in love with and wanted to be Dorothy, thinking that the stark Kansas
farmland she was trying to escape from was nothing compared to the West Texas
desert our house was built upon. The Tin Man might stand in for my girlfriend’s
older brother (and subsequent crushes on older boys): an emotionally and
physically stolid male who needed to find a heart so he could romantically
express himself to me. During my first phase with the film, I saw Dorothy’s
three male companions (on the farm and in Oz) as being like friends or brothers.
Well, maybe my heterosexual upbringing had me working to construct some sort of
love interest between Dorothy and the showoff Scarecrow. But Dorothy and the
Tin Man? Never. Hands off, girl, he’s mine!