from Edward D.C. CAMPBELL, THE CELLULOID SOUTH: Hollywood and the
Southern Myth (Knoxville, 1981)
The mythology was not
sustained by Southerners; the area simply lacked the clout to shape a picture's
outlook.
For one thing, there was the problem of how to monitor
adequately the Southern market. During the 1930s when the most nostalgic films
were released, Variety used only five Southern cities as gauges of how well a
film did financially. Of the five, only Birmingham and New Orleans were of the
Deep South; Louisville, Baltimore, and Washington, D.C., made up the balance.
The Motion Picture Herald used an equally inadequate gauge. As a result, the
industry could misperceive what would play successfully in, say, Richmond or
Atlanta. Hollywood believed that Mississippi,
which hewed to the line of antebellum romanticism, would get an excellent
response in the region, but the movie was not neatly as well liked there as in
the North. Band of Angels, on the
other hand, which dared to explore lightly the theme of miscegenation, seemed a
sure candidate for poor reviews in the South, yet proved to be well received
there. Many audiences and critics simply failed to grasp its unique
significance. One local reviewer spoke for many, viewing it only as another
picture in the traditional mold and enthusiastically exclaiming, "shades of Uncle Tom's
Cabin, The Birth of a Nation, and
Gone With the Wind and all the other
sagas of the Deep South." [24-5]
*** *** ***
Another problem involved the
fact that Southern theatres did not have the earning capacity of theatres in
other sections. Many movie houses closed from May to September because of the
heat. Moreover, the South, including Kentucky and Maryland, could only boast in
the late 30s of 3,786 theatres, with a total capacity of under
two million. The national total was 17,541 theatres, seating almost eleven
million.
The figures raise an interesting point. With less than
one-fifth the potential audience, the South could hardly dictate what Hollywood
would present. The big profits were to be made elsewhere, and thus no amount of
Southern lobbying by area managers or executives could be very persuasive.
However, the movies were consistently well attended and
the part of the nation which proved the films' popularity was the non-Southern
sector. So much more important were the other areas in determining a release's
profitability that movies were shown first outside the South, and the area
portrayed simply waited its turn. Even after rare premieres in the South, the
productions were then quickly ushered off to the more lucrative Northern
markets. Following the opening of Gone
With the Wind in Atlanta in December 1939, for example, the film was shown
by the second week of January 1940 or sooner not only in the largest
northeastern cities but also in the Midwest. Cities as large as Richmond,
Raleigh, and Birmingham waited until February. Frequently, the managers in the
South after finally getting a print had to announce shorter runs than preferred
as the demand was so heavy in the more profitable North. Southerners alone could never have made such
productions viable enterprises.
The plantation epics thrived, then, only with the help of
those sections which seemed at first glance the least likely to be enthralled
by tales of antebellum wealth, honor, society, and servitude. Actually, the
industry was agreeing with, rather than bending to, sectional whim. In the
knowledge that large audiences everywhere would welcome the product, there was
no inclination to do otherwise. [25]