Since we are dealing with a visual medium we ought surely to look for
our defining criteria in what we actually see on the screen. It is immediately
apparent that there before our eyes is a whole range of "outer
forms." There is, first of all, the setting, the chief glory of many of
the films. Often it is outdoors, in very particular kinds of country: deserts,
mountains, plains, woods. Or it is indoors--but again, special kinds of
indoors: saloons, jails, courtrooms, ranch houses, hotels, riverboats, brothels--all
places frequented by those who live an outdoor and/or wandering kind of life.
Then there are the clothes: wide-brimmed hats, open-neck shirts with
scarves, tight jeans (which have become steadily tighter as the years have gone
by), sometimes worn with leather chaps and almost always with spurs and
high-heeled boots; or, alternatively, army uniforms or the wide but carefully
distinguished variety of Indian costume. There are also certain clothes for
specialist occupations. There are bootlace ties for gamblers and black gloves
for psychopathic hired guns; a man who wears a watch chain is often a judge;
and a black hat can denote a preacher; a bowler, a newspaperman. For women
there are usually only two sorts of clothes: wide, full skirts and tight bodices
or the more tomboyish jeans and shirt. (There is a third costume usually
reserved for the Mexican girl or prostitute-often synonymous-in which the
bodice is looser and the neckline appreciably lower.)
Third, there are the various tools of the trade, principally weapons,
and of these, principally guns. They are usually specifically identified: Colt
45'S, Winchester and Springfield rifles, shotguns for certain situations (such
as robbing banks or facing a numerically superior enemy), and, in westerns of
an earlier period, single-shot, muzzle-loading muskets. Such care in the choice
of weapons is not mere pedantry nor dictated purely by
considerations of historical accuracy, for an incredible variety of arms were
in use. The weapons employed in the films are there for largely stylistic
reasons; consider, for example, the significant difference in the style of
movement required to cock a Winchester and a Lee-Enfield 303. Other weapons
have their place: knives, often the murderous looking Bowie type, whips (used
by women or bullies), sometimes cannon for the military,
and assorted Indian hardware, notably the bow and arrow. Again, there are
specialist weapons. The man who wears a bootlace tie should be watched
carefully in case he produces a Derringer.
Next in importance come horses, also used in formally differentiated
ways. Indians ride barebacked or with only a blanket, a sign perhaps of their
closeness to the animal world. White and black horses have frequently a
symbolic function, and if a woman does not ride sidesaddle she is no lady, though not
always the worse for that. Doctors and judges ride in a buggy, unless, like Doc
Holliday, they have ceased to practice. We know, too, what kind of people
travel in stagecoaches: in descending order of their entitlement to respect,
women, gamblers, corset salesmen, Easterners.
Fourth, there is a large group of miscellaneous physical objects that
recur and thereby take on a formal function. Trains are invariably of the same
kind, with cowcatchers in front of the engine, carriages with a railed open
platform at the back (useful for fights), and seats either side of a central
aisle. Mines, general stores, and forts also feature largely, representing the
corruption of money, the virtue of honest industry, and an oasis of strength in
a hostile land. Indians, too, in spite of the more liberal attitudes of the
last few years, are still primarily important not as people in their own right
but as part of the setting.
All these things operate as formal elements. That is to say, the films
are not "about" them any more than a sonnet is about fourteen lines
in a certain meter. For example, Winchester
73 (Anthony Mann, 1950) is not about the gun, which is a mere connecting
device to hold the story together. The film, like all films, is about people.
Obviously the formal structure is looser than that of a sonnet; not all the
elements need be present. But if we say that a western is a film that includes
at least one of them (and of course the list is by no means exhaustive), then
we are saying something both intelligible and useful. The visual conventions
provide a framework within which the story can be told.
Edward
Buscombe, “The Idea of Genre in the American Cinema,”
Screen 11 (1970): 33-45.