Mission
 
The mission of the Department of Economics is to create new knowledge through research, to
convey knowledge through undergraduate and graduate teaching, and to give students the ability
to make their own contributions to knowledge through skills they learn in the classroom, through
directed research, and through opportunities to work on research projects undertaken by faculty.
By doing so we hope to give our students the tools they need to be successful in their personal
lives and careers, and to be responsible citizens.
 
Vision
 
The Department of Economics hopes to become a department that is second to none in terms of
educational value added. Everything we do in the department is aimed at making sure our
students learn as much economics as possible. The Department of Economics also hopes to
improve its national reputation by increasing the quality of its research.
 
Organization
 
The Department of Economics consists of 9.5 tenure track and 2 non-tenure track faculty
members. Of the tenure track faculty, 6 are Full Professors, 2 are Associate Professors, and 2 are
Assistant Professors. One of the Full Professors, who just left the department, occupies the F.A.
Hayek Professorship. One of the non-tenure track faculty members is an Associate Teaching
Professor, the other is a lecturer. The Department has one full-time Administrative Associate and
no other staff.
 
The Department of Economics offers a Bachelor of Science, a Bachelor of Arts, a minor, and a
Master’s degree. It also provides for general and college level requirements for the School of
Business, programs in public policy, gerontology, the Honors College and continuing education.
It is the academic home of the Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Education and all
courses taught in geography. It operates the Economics Resource Center, which provides free
tutoring to students in economics courses and oversees the instructional mission of the Student
Open Computing Laboratory for Quantitative Analysis.
 
The Department of Economics normally rotates the chair position every three years. Additional
administrative duties are divided among the Director of Graduate Studies and the Director of
Undergraduate Studies.
 
  
Departmental Goals
 
In the next five years the Department of Economics will seek to effectuate its vision of
maximizing education value added by striving to achieve three goals. These goals are:
 
1. Enhance Undergraduate Degrees
2. Improve the Economics Resource Center (ERC)
3. Increase Research Quality
 
 
Goal 1: Enhance Undergraduate Degrees
 
Overall, the quality of teaching in our department is very good. Survey results and informal
feedback show that student satisfaction is very good. Success after graduation is very good as
measured by students finding good jobs or getting into good Ph.D. programs. But there is
considerable room for improvement. What we teach we teach well, but there is content that we
should be teaching that we presently are not. Our first goal is, therefore, to address specific
content deficiencies by developing new courses and hiring new faculty in the appropriate areas.
 
To adequately serve our students I believe we should increase our offering of courses in
economic history. Currently we have only one course that emphasizes American economic
history. I would like more frequent offering of courses and two separate coursers (one covering
the period from Neolithic peoples to 1700 and one from 1701 to the present). I would also like to
make at least one course in economic history a requirement for the major. That is currently
impractical because we don’t have the manpower to offer any economic history course
frequently enough. We also need a more frequent offering of history of thought (which is already
required for the B.A. degree). This will require hiring someone qualified to teach history of
thought. We also need to create courses in practical empirical economics, institutional
economics, and experimental economics.
 
We currently do not have the staffing or expertise to enhance our undergraduate program as
outlined above and the situation is likely to get worse as one of our strongest teachers will soon
retire (Bob Sorensen). We currently have no one to teach history of thought even though it is
required for the B.A. We also have no one to teach a new course in practical empirical methods
and no one to teach experimental economics.
 
To address these shortcomings and to staff additional offerings in the form of two regularly
offered economic history courses, a regularly offered new course in institutional economics, a
regularly offered new course in practical empirical economics, and a regularly offered new
course in experimental economics we need three new tenure track lines. Note that is assumes we
recover the line from the Sorensen retirement.
 
Measurement
 
Not applicable.
 
Budgetary Requirement
 
The market salary for new assistant professors of economics is approximately $90,000. Start-up
for a new hire is $5,000. This produces a one-time start-up cost of $15,000 plus a rate dollar cost
of: 3 @ $90,000 X 28% (benefits) + $1,000 annual research support = $348,600.
 
 
Goal 2: Improve the Economic Resource Center
 
The Economics Resource Center (ERC) plays a very important role in maximizing what our
students learn from their courses. Moreover, alumni attachment to the department is clearly
related to our having an ERC. I also believe that the ERC can serve as a model of how a
department can foster a stronger personal connection between students and UMSL while
improving learning outcomes at the same time.
 
But there are two problems. First, although the ERC is a big success it is operating far below its
potential because it is understaffed. To fully staff it we need an additional 3 workers working 20
hours per week. Second, the ERC is simply too small. Students frequently leave immediately for
lack of a place to sit or because it is too loud. It is also understaffed. Together these problems
cost us and the college majors (most of our majors come to us from the College of Business).
 
We need more and better space. The space across from our department office would be ideal. It
currently houses the International Business Program. When the Business School moves to its
permanent location, it is our hope that we will be assigned this space. We ask the dean for his
support in this (we have already expressed this desire to the Provost). We realize that this might
take too much time and that we might have to settle for another area if we are to grow.
 
Whatever space we ultimately acquire, we have learned that the standard classroom layout is not
very effective. We therefore anticipate needing to undertake remodeling. We would like to
undertake an external fund raising effort with an UMSL match now rather than wait for the space
to open up (obviously, having raised the funds could produce pressure to free-up space). Having
a match is crucial for successful fund raising.
 
Measurement
 
The number of student contact hours can be collected to determine if higher levels of staffing and
an improved space increases use.
 
Budgetary Requirements
 
To fully staff the ERC in its present location we need an additional three workers working 20
hours per week. The total annual cost to fully staff the ERC therefore comes to:
 
3 @ 20 hours per week @ $7.50/hour X 30 weeks X 7.5% (benefits) = $14,512.50
 
We estimate that it will cost approximately $30,000 to remodel a standard classroom space or the
International Business program office suite so as to serve as an effective tutoring and computer
lab. A contribution by the CAS as a match on external fundraising would therefore be a one time
cost of $15,000.
 
 
Goal 3: Increase Research Output Quality
 
With the exception of two who are near retirement, economics department members are actively
engaged in research. There is a communal expectation of significant research accomplishment.
Most of our department members are well regarded in their fields. Measured against other
economics departments – even those with world-class doctoral programs – our department is
very productive.
 
But while the volume is very good, the quality is merely good. This is likely due to the effect of
an overly mechanical reward system for research accomplishments. To induce faculty to be
willing to take greater risks with their research by working on more substantive and larger
questions, I have altered our compensation policy. To avoid further sclerosis due to lack of
intellectual engagement I think it is important to reinstitute support for faculty travel to
professional meetings.
 
Measurement
 
The obvious measure of success is increased output at higher ranked journals and books by
highly ranked academic presses.
 
Budgetary Requirement
 
CAS funding of travel by only $1,000 per department member per year could significantly
improve matters. This comes to $10,000 per year to fund all 10 tenured/tenure track department
members.