|
|
|
3.5 Evaluation-2 (see also Part 3) |
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

|
Ýstrong in many areas.Ý
Jamar (the student) may need to be challenged throughout the
school year with intentionally designed educational activities which give him Ýthe opportunity to reach his true potential Ýin his areas of strength. |
Indicates an area of personal
strength Ýfor a studentÖ. It may indicate strength relative to other students in class. |
|
weak in many areas.Ý Cherisse 2 and Chreisse 3 may need help and encouragement throughout the school year with intentionally designed educational activities which give each of them opportunities to improve precisely within those areas in which they now indicate weaknesses. |
Indicates an area of personal
weakness Ýfor a studentÖ. It may indicate a weakness Ýrelative to other students in class. |
|
NOTICE:Ý Ý 1. By charting September grades and
observations as above, the Teacher begins to organize student data in a
manner which allows for measurement, interpretation, clustering, pattern
recognition, and a certain amount of prediction.Ý These are elements which distinguish evaluation from bookkeeping.Ý 2. Such an evaluation process should be
followed up with diagnostic-prescriptive creation and distribution of
educational experiences and with informative and interpretive progress
reports to students, to parents, to guidance counselors, to special
education teachers, to administration. |
|
ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ
ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ