3.5 Evaluation      (see also Part 2)

 

1 Operating Instructions

1.       Organization

2-Background

1.       All children can learn

2.       Not all learn in same way

3.       Diagnostic and prescriptive

4.       Solutions which reachÝ +Ý teach students

5.       Staff development

3-Getting Started

1.       Classroom

2.       Students

3.       Curriculum

4.       Coop learning

5.       Evaluation

4-L=TBC: The Formula

1.       Basis

2.       Whole class

3.       Continuum

5-L=TBC: Models

1.       Generic

2.       Canada

3.       Belize

4.       Spanish Exploration

5.       Westward Movement

6.       The Middle Ages

7.       Role of Intern

8.       Prep forÝ field Preservice

Ý6-Meeting Student Needs

1.     Need for 21st Cent.Skills

2. 21st Cent.Skills + Curr

3. Assessment

4. Matching Resources to Student Need

5. Alt. Assessment: Tools and Pedagogy

7-Problems

1.       Classroom management

2.       Lack of focus

3.       Unwillingness

8-Solutions

1.       Getting Re-Started

2.       Graphics Boards

3.       HyperStudio

9- References

1.    End Notes

2.   Background Reading

10-The Library

1.       Print media

2.       HyperStudio

3.       Web-based

4.       CD-based

5.       On-Line

OVERVIEW:Ý ÝEvaluation must be seen as a productive part of the teaching-learning process.Ý It is not an end in itself.Ý It is not something that is done after the learning is complete.Ý Evaluation should be on going throughout the unit.Ý It should provide both measurement and reflection opportunities for teacher and students alike.Ý Evaluation should be an opportunity to continue the learning process.

 

(1) EVALUATION, NOT JUST BOOKKEEPING

1.       Without reflection and interpretation by the teacher Öwithout consultation with the studentÖ. And without communication with the parent Ö taking grades is merely an exercise in bookkeeping

2.       Evaluation should be on goingÖpart of planning, teaching, and ultimately part of learning.

3.       Consider not keeping grades by classwork, homework, quizzes, and tests Ö. InsteadÖ

4.       Consider keeping grades in meaningful categories which match the academic skills and learning strands which define the course you teach.Ý For example, group the grades as follows:Ý Note-taking, Concept Development, Reading or Writing Maps-Charts-Graphs, Oral Communication, Written Communication, Discussion Skills, Presentation Skills, etc. Ý

5.       With the help of an electronic gradebook program on the computer, the Teacher is in a position to print progress reports, which reflect each of the sub-category (#4 above) gradesÖ, and then the over-all course grade.Ý This allows Teacher, student, and parent to identify a student's relative strengths and weaknesses.Ý It provides a wealth of information for the teacher to use in constructing future educational activities for the entire class and for the individual.

 

(3) LEARNING DURING EVALUATION PROCESS

1.       Exactly what is evaluation trying to evaluate?Ý Ötrying to measure what has been remembered or Ö.trying to measure what the students understand about the information they remember?

2.       SmallÝ Group Quizzes? ..provide opportunities for students to qualify their answers.. toÝ share among themselves explanations and insights which are building blocks in the process ofÝ developing concepts

3.       In this view of evaluation, a degree of interaction between teacher and student or group of students can be very productive in the over-all teaching-learning process.

 

(2) CREATE A STUDENT PROFILE BY THE END OF SEPTEMBER

Create a chart with the following information on each student.

1.       The most recent standardized test scores

2.       Benchmark (Teacher or district made) Reading Test

3.       Benchmark (Teacher or district made) Writing Test

4.       At least two educational activities from each of the academic skill areas that comprise the course being taught.

5.       At least two educational activities resulting from a complete variety of the teaching methods anticipated to be used throughout the school year.

6.       Analyze the results of this "scatter-gram" approach.Ý See Section 3.5-Part 2 for an example.

 

(4) LEARNING AFTER EVALUATION PROCESS

1.        Careful and meaningful analysis of evaluation results can identify learning attained, progress made, opportunities for application of what has been learned, and individual or whole-class instructional needs.Ý

2.      Evaluation should be an opportunity for students to learn about themselves as measure t content they understand or what skill has been mastered.

3.        Evaluation should be on-going, throughout the instructional unit. There should be opportunities to evaluate development of skills, knowledge of content, and understanding of process.Ý

 

 (see also Part 2)