The Teaching -Learning Matrix |
|
||
|
6.3-Assessment (con¹t) |
|
||
|
1 Operating
Instructions 1.
2-Background 3.
Diagnostic and prescriptive 4.
Solutions which reachÝ
+Ý teach students 3-Getting Started 1. Classroom 2.
Students 3. Curriculum 5.
Evaluation 4-L=TBC: The
Formula 1. Basis 2. Whole
class 3. Continuum 5-L=TBC: Models 1.
Generic 2. Canada 3.
Belize 6.
The
Middle Ages Ý6-Meeting Student Needs 4. Matching Resources to Student Need 5.
Alt. Assessment: Tools and Pedagogy 7-Problems 8-Solutions 9-
References 1.
End
Notes 10-The Library 1. Print
media 2.
HyperStudio |
|||
|
(4) STANDARDIZED TESTS
and NCLB: 1.
The
reality is that standardized test scores have become the measuring stick to
determine the effectiveness (and justified existence of) an entire school.
2.
2.It
is these test scores which define the prudence of replicating good practices
or which necessitate the complete systemic renovation of a given school (or
school district).
3.
For
change and for best practices to really be effective, emphasis must be placed
on the standardized evaluation of each student.
4.
Teaching
³for the test² narrows actual growth and development by limiting the
experience conceptual base the student will need to interface with the real
world in an educated manner.
5.
Teaching
in a well-planned constructivist manner (i.e. L=TBC) enables the holistic as
well as cognitive development of the child.
6. Analysis of individual test scores coupled with a broad spectrum of observation and (traditional + alternate) classroom assessment targets individualized adjustments in pedagogy and curriculum designed to enhance success of the student |
(6) TEACHER-STUDENT
CONFERENCES: 1.
Build
learning station rotations into unit plans. One of the ³stations² in the rotation should provide the
opportunity for the teacher to act as a consultant for the students to access
as a resource. 2.
At
strategic times throughout the school year, expand the ³consultant
opportunity² to become the occasion for a formal conference between teacher
and individual student. 3. Make it a real 2-way conference: appraisal, plans, and advice should freely be exchanged by and for each participantŠstudent and teacher. |
||
|
(7) TEACHER-SUPPORT
PERSONNEL-PARENT CONFERENCE: 1. The teacher, administrator,
guidance counselor, special education teacher and parents should jointly
review the results of the teacher-student conference. In fact, this is a perfect
opportunity of student-led
"parent-teacher" conferences. 2. Obviously other conferences should
be held as needed. |
|||
|
(8) TEACHER AS DECISION
MAKER: 1.
The
teacher needs to be a decision-maker, weighing variables of need, resources,
time, sequence, duration, and follow-through with the realities facing the
students each day. Determining
student need is a cyclical
responsibility throughout the teaching-learning process. |
|||
|
(5) OBSERVATION OF
BEHAVIOR AND PERFORMANCE: 1.Observation,
analysis, and decision-making based on a student¹s day-to-day behavior and
work ethic as well as performance and achievements adds a degree of
authenticity not delivered by standardized test results. 2.See
BACKGROUND 2.3 (Diagnostic and Prescriptive) for practical implementation
ideas. |
|||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|||