|
|
|
For departments investing in Web-based distance education programs, ongoing program evaluation is necessary. As with other areas of evaluation, program evaluation is most revealing when it is multi-faceted. Having more information from a variety of sources will help to determine the program's effectiveness as well as needed areas of improvement. The information below highlights resources for program evaluation information.
Student Evaluation of the Program: In addition to course evaluation, students can be a valuable resource for program evaluation. Palloff and Pratt (1999) believe that the following program issues are most significant to students enrolled in an online degree program:
Faculty Evaluation of the Program: Program evaluation by faculty includes the effectiveness of the online courses for students. However, the area of instructor evaluation that can also be revealing for department and campus administrators is the evaluation of the course development process and the teaching process. Input from faculty about the following issues may reveal how campus resources may strengthen and/or improve resources:
Department
Evaluation of the Program: As with face-to-face offerings of degree programs, online
programs will need departmental oversight and support. Evaluation begins with
planning and approval of the curriculum committee and continues throughout
development of the program. The issue of obtaining significant faculty support
within the department cannot be overstated. Programs sometimes end before they
are completely developed and evaluated because there are not enough faculty or
experts in specialized areas who are committed to participating in development.
Support Staff Evaluation of
the Program: As with
course evaluation, expanding the evaluation audience can add helpful
information. Any campus departments who support the program with enrollment
services, student advocacy, technical help, or design/planning/development
assistance are able to provide feedback and examples from the standpoint of
being familiar with the program, yet also being external to the program.
Outside Evaluation of the Program: Evaluators from other colleges or universities may also be able
to offer ideas about ways to strengthen processes that are going well or
improve the quality of the program. It is helpful to have at least three
administrators and faculty from similar programs at other institutions. As with
course evaluation, it is also helpful to have input from those who are
experienced in effective distance education delivery. The focus of this second
group need not be on content, but rather the unique issues involved with
Web-based instruction and program development.

Let's move on to establishing a successful process for assessment and evaluation.
![]()
Destination 9: 5 of 21