|
|
|
Instructors often are interested in how to assess students' preparation, how to evaluate their work and effort, how to maintain efficiency with an overloaded schedule, how to grade, and so on. While the instructor is often ultimately responsible for evaluating students, they are not the only source of evaluation. Here, we will examine different sources of student evaluation, as well as how technology may impact the process.
Students Assessing Themselves: Self-assessment can be an important part of the total process. It will reveal to both the instructor and the student how much they have become self-directed learners. Remember, however, that the students' perception of their own progress may not be what it appears to an instructor. Self-assessment allows for a global look at personal growth. Some instructors utilize self-evaluation at midterm and the end of the semester. Others use it as closure for the course. During self-assessment, it is often helpful to refer students to the guidelines, course outline, and grading rubric provided at the beginning of the course. They may compare the information to the outcomes of their personal behaviors. Palloff and Pratt (1999) suggest asking how well students feel they have met their learning goals, how well they feel they performed overall, and what grade they think they have earned. On page 158 of their text, they provide a helpful list of possible questions for students:
Students
Evaluating Peers: Another
helpful source of evaluation information is from a student's peers. It is
particularly valuable for those courses emphasizing frequent discussion or
collaborative work. This peer evaluation could be submitted privately or used
as feedback for students from each other throughout the course. It is
particularly useful for students if regular feedback can occur with faculty
support that will facilitate groups in resolving their conflicts.
Community Involvement and Evaluating Students: Courses that include lab exercises might utilize
videotapes, CD-ROMs, DVDs, or other types of computer simulations. Some
courses, however, require lab exercises or assignments where students need
either specialized equipment or more direct supervision while they are learning
specific skills or processes. In distance education courses, instructors and
students may make arrangements to use community facilities and/or preceptors to
supervise students. The instructor usually provides the supervisor with
objectives, guidelines, and performance evaluation standards. It is critical
that students are made aware of these special computing or community
requirements before they enroll in the course.
Instructors Evaluating Students: Evaluation
of students should be multi-faceted. To the mix of self-assessment, peer
evaluation, and (if appropriate) outside supervisor evaluation, we add the
instructor's own evaluation of the students' performance within the course.
Hopefully, this does not just include examinations. Within an online course,
evaluation may also take into account student performance on assignments,
individual or group projects, and participation in online discussions. Palloff
and Pratt (1999) also recommend that the online instructor take into account
the needs and learning objectives students identified at the start of the
course, their educational level, their familiarity with technology and online
learning (and any problems that may have occurred as they adjusted to the use
of technology), and issues related to writing (i.e., the differences between
email and chat).

Let's move on to course evaluation.
![]()
Destination 9: 3 of 21