Neo-Marxian Theory

Credits, references, and bibliography

Critical Theory and the Emergence of the Culture Industry


(from: www.virb.com/themedia/photos/975549-website no longer available)

The Frankfurt School (see also) (1923, Institute for Social Research)

  1. Superstructure focus
    1. Marx and economics as infrastructural base
    2. 1930s, 1940s, and post WWII: Culture
    3. Dominant Ideology, Hegemony
    4. Culture, as the product of society, and those in control of its production, came to be seen as relatively independent from traditional capitalists
Culture industry: increasing domination of society (local copy)

    (from: http://professordvd.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/10/the-culture-ind.html
    -website no longer available)
    1. Mass culture (radio, magazines, newspapers, movies--now TV and internet)
    2. New "opiates" for the masses
    3. Deflect critical thought--anesthetizes
    4. More important than work (40 hours versus 24/7)
    5. More insidious--creeps into consciousness
    6. At work, domination tends to be clear. Impact of technology (assembly line) is obvious. Cultural control is "invisible."
    7. People tend to desire more mass culture--we seek out our own domination.
      • Pleasant control
      • Lowest common denominator (B movies, reality TV, soap operas)
      • Continual entertainment--no revolution
      • Time factor, all work and play (with a bit of sleep); no time for critical thought
      • "Who wants to be a millionaire?" (we desire to be like those who oppress us)
    8. Consumerism (and mass consumption)
      • Henry Ford: adequate wage and shorter hours--time and money to spend
      • Advertising: drives consumption--more and more time spent shopping.
      • Working harder and longer--more money to use for consumption. Mounting debt--more work.
      • Less time for revolution
    9. Today: dominated by consumption.
      • 24/7/365
      • Vacations as shopping experiences
      • Insidious advertising tailored to consumer interests ("Minority Report")
      • Complete anesthesia?
      • Shopping malls more important than factories: temples of mass culture
      • The Hollywood Blockbuster (after blockbuster, after blockbuster).



Herbert Marcuse

One-dimensional society

    1. Loss of dialectic between people and social structure.
    2. Loss of capacity to think critically.
    3. We become wrapped up in consumption rather than "becoming."
    4. Technology (at work and at play) comes to control us.
    5. Technocratic thinking: efficiency, ends--means (rationalization).
      1. Nazis
      2. Assembly-line work (no ability to think about what we do or the consequences of our production--and actually come to think of the machine as doing the production; we become appendages).
    6. Loss of reason: ability to assess choices based on human values. Capitalism as rational, but not reasonable
      1. Irrationality of rationality
        1. Culture as control rather than human expression
        2. Abundance, yet poverty
Knowledge Industry (2, p. 110)

From Web 1.0 to Web 2.0: More or less control? More or less intrusion?

Neo-Marxian Spatial Analysis: The reproduction of class relationships

  1. Henri Lefebvre on Space (1974/1984. The Production of Space . Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith. 1991. Blackwell Publishing. 2004.) (see this analysis: from "Not Bored." Number 30, February 1999).
  2. David Harvey on Space: The Political Economy of Space. (2005) in Low, S. and Smith, N. (eds), The Politics of Public Space, Routledge, New York). (local copy)
  3. Jaret, Charles. "Recent Neo-Marxist Urban Analysis." Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 9, (1983), pp. 499-525. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2946076.

From Fordism to Post-Fordism
  1. Fordism: assembly-line and mass production
  2. Fordism characterized by:
  3. Post-Fordism (past few decades):
  4. Not clear exactly when all this came about, or how far the change has gone.
The Modern World-System (another interesting account)
  1. Core
  2. Periphery
  3. Semiperiphery
See also: "The modern-world system is a key concept for a third neo-Marxian theory.  Immanuel Wallerstein coined the term to describe a largely self-contained social system with a set of boundaries and a definable life span.  Wallerstein argues that we live in a capitalist world-economy that is based on global economic division of labor and global inequality.  Core regions are dominant and exploit the rest of the world.  The periphery is exploited for its raw materials.  The semiperiphery is a residual category encompassing regions between core and periphery."(1)

Weblinks:

Chapter 5 quiz

1. Much of this page comes from the "Instructor's Manual" to accompany Contemporary Sociological Theory and Its Classical Roots: The Basics, Second Edition, George Ritzer, Mcgraw-Hill, 2007 (and 3rd edition, 2010). The Instructor's Manual was prepared by James Murphy, University of Maryland, College Park and Todd Stillman, Fayetteville State University. These excerpts are from chapter 5.
2. Ritzer, George. 2007/2010/2013. Contemporary Sociological Theory and Its Classical Roots: The Basics. 2nd/3rd/4th editions. St. Louis: McGraw-Hill

URL: http://www.umsl.edu/~keelr/3210/3210_lectures/neo-marx.html
Owner: Robert O. Keel:
rok@umsl.edu
Last Updated: Thursday, July 9, 2015 4:04 PM

Unless otherwise noted, all pages within the web site http://www.umsl.edu/~keelr/ ©2015 by Robert O. Keel.
Click here to Report Copyright Problems